Legitimising shared governance in China's higher education sector through university statutes
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21446458 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tengteng Zhuang (0000-0003-3940-4216, Institute of Higher Education Faculty of Education Beijing Normal University Beijing China), Baocun Liu (0000-0001-5159-6623, Institute of International and Comparative Education Beijing Normal University Beijing China), Yiyun Hu (0000-0002-7888-6767, Institute of International and Comparative Education Beijing Normal University Beijing China, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 57 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 33-48 |
| Publication date | 2022-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | European Journal of Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-8211 • E-ISSN: 1465-3435 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/ejed.12493 |
| OpenAlex | W4205632963 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 16 |
This article reports on a study in which the legitimisation of shared governance in the Chinese higher education sector was investigated. Norman Fairclough's three‐level discourse analysis was used for analysing documents and interviews. The research materials consist of thirteen Chinese university statutes and qualitative semi‐structured interviews with 22 university administrators, faculty members, students and social representatives. The research focused on how university statute texts articulate shared governance, and how shared governance is practically implemented. Study findings demonstrate that Chinese university statute discourses officially legitimise shared governance in various manifestations, by replacing the term management with the term governance in statute texts, explicitly using democracy‐related phrases, especially establishing a joint meeting mechanism at both institutional and departmental levels, and by using the wording multiple‐stakeholder participation in university affairs. In practice, shared governance is a recognised ideal of governance structures to embrace among all different stakeholders. Chinese universities have, more than ever before, taken up shared governance practices. Yet, the degree of participation, or sharing , in policy implementation in general, remains to be further improved compared with the ideal state stipulated in discourses. Findings identify tokenism as a feature of policy implementation. Insufficient administrative professionalism is identified as a catalyst for such tokenism—a reason for why shared governance efforts remain incomplete thus far
Corporate governance · Economics · Management · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Stakeholder · Statute · Tokenism · Higher Education Governance and Development · Law · Public Administration · Public Policy and Administration Research
Discourse and social change
The Discovery of Grounded Theory
Power landscapes within Chinese universities
Analysing Discourse
Recontextualizing European higher education policies
Modes of Governance in the Chinese Bureaucracy
Higher Education Reform in Portugal
How transformational and contingent reward leaderships influence university faculty's organizational commitment
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |