Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

A web-based review of global health programs in U.S. allopathic and osteopathic medical schools

Bibliographic Data

ID21447713
AuthorsMatthew Edwards (0000-0001-8099-0646, University School, corresponding author), M K Edwards (0000-0003-3234-1865, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, Cleveland, OH, USA), Crystal An (0000-0001-5656-9472, University School), Robert M Rohrbaugh (0000-0002-4969-4352, Yale University), R Rohrbaugh (Department of Psychiatry), Michael J Peluso (0000-0003-0585-6230, University of California, San Francisco), Suet Kam Lam (Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine)
Year2022
Volume44
Issue12
Pages1408-1412
Publication date2022-12-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Teacher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0142-159X • E-ISSN: 1466-187X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0142159x.2022.2099258
PMID35868013
OpenAlexW4286608188
LanguageEN
References cited14

PURPOSE: There is no current centralized database of structured global health programs at U.S. medical schools and no published review in the past decade. This study aims to describe the prevalence, characteristics, and requirements of non-degree, longitudinal, structured global health programs in U.S. allopathic and osteopathic medical schools. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In July 2021, the authors performed a web-based review of existing structured global health programs for the 154 U.S. allopathic medical schools and 35 U.S. osteopathic medical schools established prior to 2019. RESULTS: Of 189 institutions examined, 74 (39%) had online information about a structured global health program. Forty-three (53%) programs reported coursework requirements, 44 (54%) required a global health experience, and one program required demonstration of language or cultural knowledge. More internally administered programs required experiential work, while more externally administered programs required didactic work. There were few differences in program requirements between allopathic and osteopathic medical schools. CONCLUSIONS: There has been a 75% increase over the past ten years in the number of U.S. allopathic medical schools with websites for structured global health programs. There appeared to be little standardization in their structure and requirements. The findings support the need for a web-based central repository for updated information regarding medical school global health curricula

Allopathic medicine · Alternative medicine · Coursework · Curriculum · Family medicine · Global health · Medical education · Osteopathic medicine in the United States · Pathology · Public health · Standardization · Computer Science · Cultural Competency in Health Care · Global Health and Surgery · Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism · Medicine · Nursing · Psychology

  • Towards a common definition of global health

    Open Access•Jeffrey P Koplan, T Christopher Bond et al.•The Lancet•2009

  • Can global health opportunities lead to an increase in primary care physicians

    Open Access•Josephine Reece, Christopher Dionne et al.•Journal of Global Health•2020

  • Gaps in studies of global health education

    Open Access•Yan Liu, Ying Zhang et al.•Global Health Action•2015

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae