Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

Co-designing formal health professions curriculum in partnership with students

A scoping review

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21448601
AutoresJessica Abbonizio (0000-0002-5510-0012, Monash University, autor correspondente), Claire Palermo (0000-0002-9423-5067, Monash University), Gabrielle Brand (0000-0001-6606-6721, Monash University), Niels Buus (0000-0003-4980-4096, Monash University), Ellie Fossey (0000-0002-8002-5763, Monash University), Janeane Dart (0000-0002-7563-0395, Monash University)
Ano2025
Volume47
Fascículo3
Páginas413-424
Data de publicação2025-03-04
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessNão
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoMedical Teacher (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0142-159X • E-ISSN: 1466-187X
EditoraInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0142159x.2024.2339403
PMID38621357
OpenAlexW4394808996
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas7
Referências citadas43

There is growing evidence of the value of co-design and partnering with students in the design, development, and delivery of health professions education (HPE). However, the way in which students participate in co-designing HPE remains largely unexplored and there is little guidance on how to embed and strengthen partnerships with students. Using scoping review methodology, we identified and aggregated research reporting studies in which students were active partners in co-designing formal curricula in HPE. After searching five databases and screening 12,656 articles against inclusion criteria, 21 studies were identified. We found that most of the research was based in medical programs (n = 15) across Western contexts. Studies were mostly descriptive case reports (n = 10), with only three studies utilising participatory/action research designs. The co-designed outputs were mostly classroom-based learning on challenging HPE topics, for example, ethics, health inequities, racial and sexual bias, global health, and Indigenous health. Detailed descriptions of student-faculty partnerships and underpinning approaches were lacking overall. To optimise co-design methods, HPE and research require deeper engagement with critical research and pedagogical approaches and more robust evaluations of the processes, outputs and outcomes of co-design. In pedagogical practices, this necessitates challenging institutional structures, teaching and learning cultures and relational elements, such as through creating formal roles and opportunities for students as active co-design partners and fostering more equitable student-faculty positioning in HPE

Curriculum · Engineering ethics · General partnership · Inclusion (mineral) · Medical education · Participatory action research · Participatory design · Pedagogy · Political science · Sociology · Engineering · Higher Education and Employability · Higher Education Practises and Engagement · Innovations in Medical Education · Medicine · Psychology

  • Mapping educational scholarship in a mixed-financing health system

    Open Access•May May Yeo, Aditee Narayan et al.•BMC Medical Education•2026

  • Reshaping Higher Education Designs and Futures

    Open Access•Sandris Zeivots, Alison Casey et al.•Postdigital Science and Education•2025

  • Whose voices are heard in health professions education validity arguments

    Open Access•Georgina C Stephens, Gabrielle Brand et al.•Medical Education•2024

  • Before the first class

    Naomi Steenhof, Heather Abela et al.•Medical Teacher•2025

  • Twelve tips to afford students agency in programmatic assessment

    Open Access•Janica Jamieson, Dario Torre•Medical Teacher•2025

  • The role of artificial intelligence in co-creation of health professions education

    Open Access•Shireen Suliman, Salah Eldin Kassab et al.•Medical Teacher•2026

  • Health Literacy‐Focused Communication Training for Primary Healthcare Providers Working With Older Adults

    Open Access•Lesley O'Brien, Michael T Lawle et al.•Health Expectations•2026

  • A Systematic Literature Review of Students as Partners in Higher Education

    Open Access•Lucy Mercer-Mapstone, Sam Lucie Dvorakova et al.•International Journal for…•2017

  • Health professionals for a new century

    Open Access•Julio Frenk, Lincoln Chen et al.•The Lancet•2010

  • Scoping studies

    Open Access•Danielle Levac, Heather Colquhoun et al.•Implementation Science•2010

  • Do students experience transformation through co-creating curriculum in higher education

    Open Access•Tanya Lubicz-Nawrocka, Catherine Bovill•Teaching in Higher Education•2023

  • Innovation in Response to the Covid-19 Pandemic Crisis

    James O Woolliscroft•Academic Medicine•2020

  • Toward a Bias-Free and Inclusive Medical Curriculum

    Laura Benoit, Laura J Benoit et al.•Academic Medicine•2020

  • Students as partners practices and theorisations in Asia

    Yifei Liang, Kelly E Matthews•Higher Education Research &…•2021

  • Engaging students as partners in intercultural partnership practices

    Meng Zhang, Kelly E Matthews et al.•Higher Education Research &…•2023

  • The hunter and the lion

    Open Access•Gabrielle Brand, Janeane Dart•Medical Education•2022

  • An intersectional participatory action research approach to explore and address class elitism in medical education

    Open Access•Abigail Foreshew, Abi Foreshew et al.•Medical Education•2022

  • Student-faculty co-creation of experiential learning in health systems science

    Alyssa R Greenhouse, Rebecca S Goldstein et al.•Medical Teacher•2022

  • Learner involvement in the co-creation of teaching and learning

    Open Access•Karen D Könings, Serge Mordang et al.•Medical Teacher•2021

  • Student engagement in health professions education

    Salah Eldin Kassab, David Taylor et al.•Medical Teacher•2023

  • Learning Skills of Professionalism

    Open Access•Margaret Horlick, Deirdre Masterton et al.•Medical Education Online•2006

  • Scoping studies

    Hilary Arksey, Lisa O’malley•International Journal of Social…•2005

  • Revealing student nurses' perceptions of human dignity through curriculum co-design

    Open Access•Sarah-Anne Muñoz, Leah Macaden et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

Obras citantes distintas7
Citações por ano3,5
Intervalo de citações2024 - 2026 (3)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 7
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae