Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Engaging clinical examiners with structured feedback to enhance assessment practices

Bibliographic Data

ID21448752
AuthorsWai Yee Amy Wong (0000-0002-3053-0729, The University of Queensland, corresponding author), Karen Moni (0000-0001-9035-9030, The University of Queensland), Chris Roberts (0000-0002-8889-5616, The University of Sydney), Jill Thistlethwaite (0000-0001-8122-4679, Faculty of Health, The University of Technology Sydney, Sydney, Australia)
Year2022
Volume44
Issue8
Pages914-921
Publication date2022-08-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueMedical Teacher (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0142-159X • E-ISSN: 1466-187X
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0142159x.2022.2049734
PMID35343380
OpenAlexW4220997763
LanguageEN
References cited17

INTRODUCTION: Examiners' professional judgements of student performance are pivotal to making high-stakes decisions to ensure graduating medical students are competent to practise. Clinicians play a key role in assessment in medical education. They are qualified in their clinical area but may require support to further develop their understanding of assessment practices. However, there are limited studies on providing examiners with structured feedback on their assessment practices for professional development purposes. METHODS: This study adopts an interpretive paradigm to develop an understanding of clinical examiners' interpretations of receiving structured feedback and its impacts on enhancing their assessment literacy and practice. Data were collected from 29 interviews with clinical examiners who assessed the final-year medical objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs) at one university. RESULTS: Inductive thematic analysis of these data revealed that the examiners considered the feedback to be useful with practical functions in facilitating communication, comparisons and self-reflection. However, the examiners' level of confidence in the appropriateness of their assessment practices and difficulties in interpreting feedback could be barriers to adopting better practices. CONCLUSION: Feedback for examiners needs to be practical, targeted, and relevant to support them making accountable and defensible judgements of student performance

Clinical Practice · Educational measurement · Formative assessment · MEDLINE · Qualitative research · Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills · Innovations in Medical Education · Student Assessment and Feedback

  • Developing evaluative judgement

    Open Access•Jeanne Tai, Joanna Tai et al.•Higher Education•2018

  • Examiners’ decision‐making processes in observation‐based clinical examinations

    Open Access•Bunmi S Malau-Aduli, Richard Hays et al.•Medical Education•2021

  • Performance assessment

    Katharine Boursicot, KK Brahma et al.•Medical Teacher•2021

  • ‘I’m an assessment illiterate’

    Emma Medland•Assessment & Evaluation in Higher…•2019

  • Situated Learning

    Open Access•Jean Lave, Etienne Wenger•Situated Learning•1991

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae