Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Mathematical Logic in the History of Logic

Łukasiewicz’s Contribution and Its Reception

Bibliographic Data

ID21451343
AuthorsZuzana Rybaříková (0000-0002-6128-1868, University of Ostrava, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume45
Issue2
Pages98-108
Publication date2024-04-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHistory and Philosophy of Logic (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-5340 • E-ISSN: 1464-5149
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01445340.2024.2325837
OpenAlexW4395453786
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited29

Łukasiewicz introduced a new methodological approach to the history of logic. It consists of the use of modern formal logic in the research of the history of logic. Although he was not the first to use formal logic in his historical research, Łukasiewicz was the first who used it consistently and formulated it as a requirement for a historian of logic. The aim of this paper is to present Łukasiewicz's contribution and the history of its formulation. In addition, the paper will present its reception. There are two main themes in Łukasiewicz’s work on the history of logic. He discussed Stoic logic and Aristotle’s syllogistic. The second part of the paper focuses on current reception of Łukasiewicz’s contribution and on the question of whether there is a difference between knowledge about his contribution to Stoic logic and to Aristotle’s syllogistic, given that it has been hypothesised that Łukasiewicz’s contribution is currently more known among Aristotelian scholars than among those who focus on Stoic logic. Based on the papers that have appeared in the last five years at Web of Science and Scopus this hypothesis has not been confirmed

Description logic · Epistemology · Higher-order logic · Paraconsistent logic · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Language and Culture · Mathematics · Philosophy

  • Dąmbska’s precisification of absolute truth through the concept of language

    Open Access•Joseph Ulatowski•Studies in East European Thought•2026

  • Propozycja pewnej metody badań w ramach historii nauki w kontekście dyskusji nad jej naukowym statusem

    Open Access•Wiesław Wójcik•Studia Historiae Scientiarum•2025

  • Dialectic, the Dictum de Omni and Ecthesis

    Michel Crubellier, Manier Marion et al.•History and Philosophy of Logic•2019

  • Aristotle’s Natural Deduction System

    John Corcoran•Ancient Logic and Its Modern…•1974

  • Syllogism and quantification

    Open Access•Timothy Smiley•The Journal of Symbolic Logic•1962

  • A Logic for Aristotle's Modal Syllogistic

    Clarence Lewis Protin•History and Philosophy of Logic•2023

  • Analysis in Prior Analytics I.45

    Igor Martinjak•History and Philosophy of Logic•2022

  • Cracow Circle. Theology in the Lvov-Warsaw School

    Open Access•Marcin Tkaczyk•The Significance of the…•2017

  • The Cracow Circle

    Józef M Bocheński•Vienna Circle and the Lvov-Warsaw…•1989

  • Cracow Circle and Its Philosophy of Logic and Mathematics

    Open Access•Roman Murawski•Axiomathes•2014

  • Crísipo de solós y los indemostrables

    Open Access•Alejandra Rasse Figueroa, Alejandro Ramírez Figueroa•Revista de filosofía•2018

  • Józef M. Bocheński and the Cracow Circle

    Open Access•Jan Wolenski•Studies in East European Thought•2013

  • Demonstration and the Indemonstrability of the Stoic Indemonstrables

    Susanne Bobzien•Phronesis•2020

  • Jan Łukasiewicz’s program of the logicization of philosophy

    Open Access•Anna Brożek•Synthese•2022

Unique citing works2
Citations per year2
Citation span2025 - 2026 (2)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae