To Cut Down the Dreaming

Epistemic Violence, Ambivalence and the Logic of Coloniality

Bibliographic Data

ID2145142
AuthorsA Kearney (0000-0002-4559-0660, Flinders University, corresponding author)
Year2021
Volume31
Issue3
Pages312-334
Publication date2021-07-03
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueAnthropological Forum (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0066-4677 • E-ISSN: 1469-2902
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/00664677.2021.1963672
OpenAlexW3196284938
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited30

The main argument presented here is that in cultural contact zones, such as the Australian settler state, there can emerge violent tendencies in dominant patterns of thought, as both epistemic habits and systems of value. The logic of coloniality is one of war, destruction and inequality, and this is expressed through attempted erasure and actual ambivalence towards Indigenous peoples, their lands, waters, Laws and cultures. This is supported by habits of epistemic violence and axiological retreat. This paper examines such habits, through an ethnographically informed and localised case study of the destruction of an ancestral Dreaming site on Yanyuwa country in the Gulf of Carpentaria, northern Australia. In this instance the body of Yulungurri, the ancestral Tiger Shark, manifest in a large cycad palm, was cut down. Read through the lens of axiological retreat, and coloniality’s ambivalence towards Indigenous presence, the discussion considers the dispositions which lead to and support violence in such forms and how these might become naturalised or concealed in everyday life

Ambivalence · Argument (complex analysis · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Ethnography · Indigenous · Sociology · State (computer science · Value (mathematics · Anthropological Studies and Insights · Anthropology · Ecology · Geographies of human-animal interactions · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Philosophy · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOI