Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Causal discovery and counterfactual reasoning to optimize persuasive dialogue policies

Bibliographic Data

ID21452227
AuthorsDonghuo Zeng (0000-0002-6425-6270, KDDI Research, Inc., corresponding author), Roberto Legaspi (0000-0001-8909-635X, KDDI Research, Inc.), Yuewen Sun (0009-0002-4842-1608, Carnegie Mellon University), Xinshuai Dong (Carnegie Mellon University), Kazushi Ikeda (0000-0003-3330-6121, KDDI Research, Inc.), Peter Spirtes (0000-0002-1385-190X, Carnegie Mellon University), Kun Zhang (0000-0003-1636-5373, Carnegie Mellon University)
Year2026
Volume45
Issue8
Pages1515-1529
Publication date2026-05-09
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueBehaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0144929x.2025.2478276
OpenAlexW4408648820
LanguageEN
References cited28

Tailoring persuasive conversations to users leads to more effective persuasion. However, existing dialogue systems often struggle to adapt to dynamically evolving user states. This paper presents a novel method that leverages causal discovery and counterfactual reasoning for optimising system persuasion capability and outcomes. We employ the Greedy Relaxation of the Sparsest Permutation (GRaSP) algorithm to identify causal relationships between user and system utterance strategies, treating user strategies as states and system strategies as actions. GRaSP identifies user strategies as causal factors influencing system responses, which inform a Bidirectional Conditional Generative Adversarial Network (BiCoGAN) in generating counterfactual utterances for the system. Subsequently, we use the Dueling Double Deep Q-Network (D3QN) model to utilise counterfactual data to determine the best policy for selecting system utterances. Our experiments with the PersuasionForGood dataset show measurable improvements in persuasion outcomes using our approach compared to baseline methods. The observed increase in cumulative rewards and Q-values highlights the effectiveness of causal discovery in enhancing counterfactual reasoning and optimising reinforcement learning policies for online dialogue systems

Counterfactual conditional · Counterfactual thinking · Economics · Positive economics · Advanced Software Engineering Methodologies · Advanced Text Analysis Techniques · Computer Science · Multi-Agent Systems and Negotiation · Psychology · Social Psychology

  • Causality

    Open Access•Judea Pearl•Causality•2009

  • Human-level control through deep reinforcement learning

    Open Access•Volodymyr Mnih, Koray Kavukcuoglu et al.•Nature•2015

  • Personalized Persuasion

    Open Access•Jacob B Hirsh, Sonia K Kang et al.•Psychological Science•2012

  • Persuasive System Design Does Matter

    Open Access•Saskia M Kelders, Robin N Kok et al.•Journal of Medical Internet…•2012

  • Psychological Reactance and Persuasive Health Communication

    Open Access•Tobias Reynolds-Tylus, Tobias Reynolds‐tylu•Frontiers in Communication•2019

  • On the Nature of Reactance and its Role in Persuasive Health Communication

    James Price Dillard, Lijiang Shen•Communication Monographs•2005

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae