Computed compatibility
Examining user perceptions of AI and matchmaking algorithms
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21452624 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Aditi Paul (0000-0001-9476-2134, Communication and Media Studies, Pace University, New York, NY, USA, corresponding author), Saifuddin Ahmed (0000-0001-6372-213X, Nanyang Technological University) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 5 |
| Pages | 1002-1015 |
| Publication date | 2024-04-03 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Behaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/0144929x.2023.2196579 |
| OpenAlex | W4365813599 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 2 |
| References cited | 43 |
Artificial intelligence (AI) driven matchmaking algorithms are at the core of modern-day dating. Millions of users rely on these algorithms used by online dating platforms for successful matchmaking. However, a scholarly understanding of user perceptions of AI-driven matchmaking algorithms is limited. We explore the factors affecting users’ perceived effectiveness of matchmaking algorithms and analyze how users’ perception of AI’s fairness, social presence, and the threat posed by AI are associated with their perceived effectiveness of matchmaking algorithms. We also investigate if their previous relationship initiation experience through online dating platforms further moderates the studied relationships. An analysis of survey data from Singapore suggests that those who perceive AI to be fair and have higher levels of social presence are more likely to showcase a higher degree of perceived effectiveness of matchmaking algorithms. Moreover, those who have previously been successful in online dating relationship initiation are also more likely to believe in the perceived effectiveness of these algorithms. Further, previous experience of relationship initiation conditionally impacts the relationship between users’ general AI perceptions and perceived effectiveness. We also find that males and younger respondents are more likely to believe in the efficacy of matchmaking algorithms. Practical implications are offered
Algorithm · Machine learning · Perception · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Sexual function and dysfunction studies · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology
Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making
Disintermediating your friends
Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence
Anthropomorphism of computers
Online Dating
Machine behaviour
There is a blind spot in AI research
Hey Alexa … examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants
Algorithm appreciation
The social psychology of telecommunications
Machine gaze in online behavioral targeting
Incidental news exposure on social media and political participation gaps
The algorithmic imaginary
To be or not to be algorithm aware
In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence
Love me Tinder
What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating
Online dating system design and relational decision making
The benefit of being physically present
From first email to first date
Experiencing Algorithms
Where Dating Meets Data
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2024 - 2025 (2) |
| Highly cited | No |