Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Computed compatibility

Examining user perceptions of AI and matchmaking algorithms

Bibliographic Data

ID21452624
AuthorsAditi Paul (0000-0001-9476-2134, Communication and Media Studies, Pace University, New York, NY, USA, corresponding author), Saifuddin Ahmed (0000-0001-6372-213X, Nanyang Technological University)
Year2024
Volume43
Issue5
Pages1002-1015
Publication date2024-04-03
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueBehaviour and Information Technology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0144-929X • E-ISSN: 1362-3001
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/0144929x.2023.2196579
OpenAlexW4365813599
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited43

Artificial intelligence (AI) driven matchmaking algorithms are at the core of modern-day dating. Millions of users rely on these algorithms used by online dating platforms for successful matchmaking. However, a scholarly understanding of user perceptions of AI-driven matchmaking algorithms is limited. We explore the factors affecting users’ perceived effectiveness of matchmaking algorithms and analyze how users’ perception of AI’s fairness, social presence, and the threat posed by AI are associated with their perceived effectiveness of matchmaking algorithms. We also investigate if their previous relationship initiation experience through online dating platforms further moderates the studied relationships. An analysis of survey data from Singapore suggests that those who perceive AI to be fair and have higher levels of social presence are more likely to showcase a higher degree of perceived effectiveness of matchmaking algorithms. Moreover, those who have previously been successful in online dating relationship initiation are also more likely to believe in the perceived effectiveness of these algorithms. Further, previous experience of relationship initiation conditionally impacts the relationship between users’ general AI perceptions and perceived effectiveness. We also find that males and younger respondents are more likely to believe in the efficacy of matchmaking algorithms. Practical implications are offered

Algorithm · Machine learning · Perception · Artificial Intelligence · Computer Science · Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior · Psychology · Sexual function and dysfunction studies · Sexuality, Behavior, and Technology

  • Challenges and opportunities in using interpretable AI to develop relationship interventions

    Open Access•Daniel J Puhlman, Chaofan Chen•Family Relations•2025

  • Romantic relationship initiation and escalation through mobile dating apps

    Open Access•Kathryn D Coduto, J Fox•Journal of Social and Personal…•2024

  • Strategic opportunities (and challenges) of algorithmic decision-making

    Open Access•Sue Newell, Marco Marabelli•The Journal of Strategic…•2015

  • Disintermediating your friends

    Open Access•M J Rosenfeld, Reuben J Thomas et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2019

  • Human Trust in Artificial Intelligence

    Ella Glikson, Anita Williams Woolley•Academy of Management Annals•2020

  • Anthropomorphism of computers

    Open Access•Youjeong Kim, Sundar et al.•Computers in Human Behavior•2012

  • Online Dating

    Open Access•E J Finkel, Paul W Eastwick et al.•Psychological Science in the…•2012

  • Machine behaviour

    Open Access•Iyad Rahwan, Manuel Cebrian et al.•Nature•2019

  • There is a blind spot in AI research

    Open Access•K Crawford, Ryan Calo•Nature•2016

  • Hey Alexa … examine the variables influencing the use of artificial intelligent in-home voice assistants

    Open Access•Graeme McLean, Kofi Osei-Frimpong•Computers in Human Behavior•2019

  • Algorithm appreciation

    Open Access•Jennifer M Logg, Julia A Minson et al.•Organizational Behavior and Human…•2019

  • The social psychology of telecommunications

    John Short•The social psychology of…•1976

  • Machine gaze in online behavioral targeting

    Open Access•Bingjie Liu, Lewen Wei•Computers in Human Behavior•2021

  • Incidental news exposure on social media and political participation gaps

    Open Access•Saifuddin Ahmed, Teresa Gil-Lopez•Telematics and Informatics•2022

  • The algorithmic imaginary

    Taina Bucher•Information Communication & Society•2017

  • To be or not to be algorithm aware

    Open Access•Anne-Britt Gran, Peter Booth et al.•Information Communication & Society•2021

  • In AI we trust? Perceptions about automated decision-making by artificial intelligence

    Open Access•Theo Araujo, Natali Helberger et al.•AI & Society•2020

  • Love me Tinder

    Open Access•Sindy R Sumter, Laura Vandenbosch et al.•Telematics and Informatics•2016

  • What predicts first date success? A longitudinal study of modality switching in online dating

    Open Access•L L Sharabi, John P Caughlin•Personal Relationships•2017

  • Online dating system design and relational decision making

    Open Access•Stephanie Tom Tong, Jeffrey T Hancock et al.•Personal Relationships•2016

  • The benefit of being physically present

    Open Access•Jamy Li•International Journal of…•2015

  • From first email to first date

    Open Access•L L Sharabi, Tiffany A Dykstra-Devette•Journal of Social and Personal…•2019

  • Experiencing Algorithms

    Open Access•Joëlle Swart•Social Media + Society•2021

  • Where Dating Meets Data

    Open Access•Christoph Lutz, Giulia Ranzini•Social Media + Society•2017

Citations per year1
Citation span2024 - 2025 (2)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae