A Privileged Point of View
Effects of Subjective Socioeconomic Status on Naïve Realism and Political Division
Datos Bibliográficos
| ID | 21453870 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jazmin L Brown-Iannuzzi (0000-0002-2247-8385, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, USA, autor de correspondencia), Kristjen B Lundberg (0000-0003-3675-6945, University of Richmond, VA, USA), Aaron C Kay (0000-0001-7895-0987, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA), B Keith Payne (0000-0001-9651-5903, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA) |
| Año | 2021 |
| Volumen | 47 |
| Número | 2 |
| Páginas | 241-256 |
| Fecha de publicación | 2021-02-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sí |
| Open Access | Sí |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Revista | Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores de la revista | ISSN: 0146-1672 • E-ISSN: 1552-7433 |
| Editorial | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/0146167220921043 |
| PMID | 32458734 |
| OpenAlex | W3030747277 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citas recibidas | 3 |
| Referencias citadas | 43 |
In the United States, both economic inequality and political conflict are on the rise. We investigated whether subjective socioeconomic status (SSS) may help explain why these dual patterns emerge. We hypothesized that higher SSS may increase naïve realism—the belief that one perceives the world as it is, rather than as interpreted through one’s own knowledge and beliefs—regarding political issues. Using a representative sample of the American electorate, we found that higher SSS predicted more political naïve realism toward those from a different political party (Study 1). The remaining experiments examined the causal relationship between SSS and political naïve realism (Studies 2–5). We extended these findings by investigating whether SSS influenced participants’ willingness to exclude those with contrary views from a vote (Studies 4 and 5). Together, these studies demonstrate that SSS enhances political naïve realism and can lead to the exclusion of others with contrary opinions
Economics · Epistemology · Political science · Politics · Positive economics · Realism · Socioeconomic status · Sociology · SSS · Cultural Differences and Values · Demography · Law · Mathematics · Philosophy · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social and Intergroup Psychology · Social Psychology
Judgment under Uncertainty
Perception and misperception of bias in human judgment
Social Class, Contextualism, and Empathic Accuracy
Social Class Culture Cycles
How We See Ourselves and How We See Others
When Disagreement Gets Ugly
Psychological Barriers to Dispute Resolution
Objectivity in the Eye of the Beholder
When the Boss Feels Inadequate
The Bias Blind Spot
Subjective Status Shapes Political Preferences
Computational Tools for Probing Interactions in Multiple Linear Regression, Multilevel Modeling, and Latent Curve Analysis
Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning
Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1
Unequal Democracy
Attitudinal Ambivalence and the Conflict between Group and System Justification Motives in Low Status Groups
Wealth and the Inflated Self
Motivated numeracy and enlightened self-government
The Willingness to State an Opinion
Income Inequality and Partisan Voting in the United States
Inequality and Relative Ability Beliefs
The “false consensus effect”
Naïve realism and capturing the “wisdom of dyads”
A Theory of Social Comparison Processes
Biased Judgment of Political Bias
Testing Theories of American Politics
Evaluation of performance as a function of performer's reward and attractiveness
Differential construal and the false consensus effect
Biased assimilation and attitude polarization
A model of (often mixed) stereotype content
Political Polarization in the American Public
Having less, giving more
The case for motivated reasoning
Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality
Why Hasn't Democracy Slowed Rising Inequality
| Obras citantes distintas | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citas por año | 1 |
| Intervalo de citas | 2023 - 2025 (3) |
| Velocidad de citación | recent |
| Altamente citado | No |
| Tipos de cita | Neutras: 3 |