Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Juries are different

Racial and ethnic differences in trust across legal institutions

Bibliographic Data

ID21455065
AuthorsMelanie B Fessinger (0000-0002-5170-189X, Arizona State University), Hannah J Rath (0009-0005-9680-0401), Hannah Rath (Arizona State University), Daryl A Wout (0000-0001-6092-2670, John Jay College of Criminal Justice)
Year2026
Publication date2026-07-09
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw and Human Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0147-7307 • E-ISSN: 1573-661X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/lhb0000665
PMID42423678
OpenAlexW7167849107
LanguageEN

OBJECTIVE: We explored how White, Black, and Hispanic people rated their trust in juries, whether these patterns differed from their trust in courts, what potential mechanisms might explain any observed differences, and what potential outcomes might be associated with them. HYPOTHESES: We expected White participants to have the most trust in juries (Hypothesis 1) and Black participants to have the least trust in juries (Hypothesis 2). We expected Hispanic participants to have more trust in juries than Black participants (Hypothesis 3). However, given inconsistencies in the existing literature, we did not make definitive predictions for Hispanic compared to White participants; they may have less trust in juries than White people (Hypothesis 4a) or may not significantly differ from White people (Hypothesis 4b). METHOD: = 39.31, 53% female) who rated their trust in juries (α = .97; Bornstein et al., 2020) and trust in courts (α = .87; Tyler & Sevier, 2014) and answered exploratory measures about potential mechanisms or consequences related to trust. RESULTS: Patterns for trust in juries were distinct from those for trust in courts. White and Black participants reported higher trust in juries than Hispanic participants, but White participants reported higher trust in courts than Black and Hispanic participants. There was also an indirect effect on trust in juries through perceived representativeness, in which Black and Hispanic participants perceived juries as less representative of their own racial or ethnic group and, in turn, had less trust in juries. CONCLUSIONS: Results extend the existing literature on institutional trust by demonstrating unique racial and ethnic patterns on trust in juries. They also underscore the role of perceived representativeness, highlighting the importance of increasing the diversity of juries. Such efforts can increase trust in juries and have downstream effects on legal behaviors. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2026 APA, all rights reserved)

Ethnic group · Exploratory analysis · Exploratory research · Legal psychology · Race (biology) · White (mutation) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law in Society and Culture

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae