Predictive validity of the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (Savry) among a sample of Asian Canadian youth on probation

OBJECTIVE: Although past studies suggest that the Structured Assessment of Violence Risk in Youth (SAVRY; Borum et al., 2006) has moderate predictive validity, its predictive validity with Asian youth in Western countries is unknown. We therefore compared the SAVRY's predictive validity in a sample of Asian Canadian versus White Canadian youth. HYPOTHESES: Given that the SAVRY is normed on samples comprising mostly youth who are White, we expected its predictive validity for recidivism would be lower for Asian Canadians than White Canadians. METHOD: We examined youth probation officers' SAVRY assessments for 573 youth (445 White Canadians, 56 East/Southeast Asian Canadians, and 72 South Asian Canadians) on community supervision (i.e. probation) in a Canadian province. Youth were prospectively followed for an average of 1.97 years (SD = 0.56 years) to determine if they were subsequently charged with violent or nonviolent offenses. RESULTS: Asian Canadians scored significantly lower on risk total scores compared to White Canadians. Predictive validity for violent and nonviolent recidivism fell in the medium to large range for East/Southeast Asian Canadians (AUCs = .69 to .89) and South Asian Canadians (AUCs = .64 to .83). In comparison, predictive validity for White Canadians was generally lower (AUCs = .63 to .77; small to large range). Risk total scores and nonviolent risk ratings significantly predicted nonviolent recidivism better for East/Southeast Asian Canadians (AUCs = .89 and .87, respectively) than White Canadians (AUCs = .77 and .71, respectively). Despite few significant differences between Asian subgroups, predictive validity for nonviolent risk ratings was significantly higher in East/Southeast Asian Canadians (AUC = .87) than South Asian Canadians (AUC = .64). CONCLUSIONS: The SAVRY may be a useful tool for predicting recidivism with Asian Canadians. However, future research should examine the SAVRY's predictive validity for youth of Asian descent in different countries and contexts. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2021 APA, all rights reserved)

Asian americans · Criminology · Developmental psychology · Ethnic group · Incremental validity · Legal psychology · Political science · Predictive validity · Psychometrics · Sample (material) · Test validity · Bullying, Victimization, and Aggression · Child Abuse and Trauma · Clinical Psychology · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

• Longitudinal Cohort Study

  Open Access•Richard Dembo, Sheena K Gardner et al.•Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice•2024

  Add to list

• Two-Level, Confirmatory Factor Analysis of the Single Factor Savry Individual/Clinical Risk Measure Across Mississippi Juvenile Court Jurisdictions

  Open Access•Richard Dembo, Sheena K Gardner et al.•Youth Violence and Juvenile Justice•2026

  Add to list

• A scoping review of strengths-based risk and needs assessments for youth involved in the juvenile legal system

  Open Access•Ashlee R Barnes, Ashlee R Barnes-Lee et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2023

  Add to list