LGBT workplace protections as an extension of the protected class framework

Bibliographic Data

ID21455151
AuthorsRussell L Steiger (0000-0002-0724-3924, DePaul University), P J Henry (0000-0002-0599-4492), Patrick Henry (0000-0002-5690-7539, New York University)
Year2020
Volume44
Issue4
Pages251-265
Publication date2020-08-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw and Human Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0147-7307 • E-ISSN: 1573-661X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/lhb0000418
PMID32757608
OpenAlexW3048035623
LanguageEN
Citations received6
References cited23

OBJECTIVES: Many corporations in the United States have enacted nondiscrimination policies for their LGBT employees, despite that the LGBT community has not been a legally protected class concerning employment discrimination at the national level. We examined whether progressive corporate LGBT-related policies may be an extension of policies and practices designed to foster diversity and create equality for existing legally protected classes (women, ethnic minorities, veterans, and those with disabilities). We also examined whether leadership level diversity (percentage of women and ethnic minorities on company boards of directors) predicted nondiscrimination policies for LGBT employees. HYPOTHESES: We predicted companies that have been recognized and awarded for protected class diversity policies and that have a greater percentage of women and racial/ethnic minorities on their boards of directors would have more progressive LGBT-related corporate policies. METHOD: Using a sample of Fortune 500 companies, we examined protected-class diversity awards and percentage of women and racial/ethnic minorities on boards of directors as predictors of LGBT-related policies. At the company-level, we controlled for the average age of board, company size, and company revenue. At the level of company headquarter location, we controlled for political climate, Christian religiosity, and LGBT employment nondiscrimination laws. We also controlled for U.S. region and industry sector. RESULTS: Multilevel modeling results indicated that protected-class diversity awards and the percentage of women on company boards of directors significantly and independently predicted progressive LGBT policy scores, whereas the percentage of racial/ethnic minorities on boards of directors had less consistent results. CONCLUSION: Companies that address issues of diversity and equality in the workplace have been likely to include the LGBT community among their groups of concern, even in the absence of legal pressures to do so. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Class (philosophy) · Criminology · Epistemology · Extension (predicate logic) · Legal psychology · Business Law and Ethics · Computer Science · Discrimination and Equality Law · Gender Diversity and Inequality · Psychology · Social Psychology

Tools

Open DOI