Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The relationship between victim impact statements and judicial decision making

An archival analysis of sentencing outcomes

Bibliographic Data

ID21455154
AuthorsGena K Dufour (0000-0002-7784-7467), Marguerite Ternes (0000-0003-0742-8619), Veronica Stinson (0000-0003-0278-5035)
Year2023
Volume47
Issue4
Pages484-498
Publication date2023-08-01
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw and Human Behavior (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0147-7307 • E-ISSN: 1573-661X
PublisherAmerican Psychological Association (APA) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1037/lhb0000535
PMID37347897
OpenAlexW4381614065
LanguageEN
Citations received1

OBJECTIVE: Victim impact statements (VISs) are testimonies that convey the emotional, physical, and financial harm that victims have suffered as the result of a crime. Although VISs are often presented to the court at sentencing, it is unclear whether they impact judicial decisions regarding sentencing. HYPOTHESES: We did not have any formal a priori hypothesis but instead examined five research questions. The first two explored whether the relationship between the victim and the offender, as well as the type of crime, was associated with differences in the likelihood of VIS submission. The following two explored whether the presence of a VIS was associated with differences in sentencing outcomes (incarceration, probation, ancillary orders, parole eligibility). The final research question explored whether the number of VISs and the delivery format (oral vs. written) was associated with differences in sentencing outcomes. METHOD: We coded and analyzed 1,332 sentencing rulings across Canada from 2016 to 2018 that included the phrase "impact statement." We coded for 87 variables, including information about the VIS, the victims and offenders, crime type, and sentencing outcomes. RESULTS: Overall, VISs are more likely to be delivered in cases in which the crime is more severe. Once we controlled for the type of crime, sentencing outcomes were unrelated to the presence of VISs. Sentences were longer when VISs were delivered orally than in written format and when more than one statement was submitted. CONCLUSIONS: The relationship between VISs and sentencing outcomes is closely tied to several extralegal factors and should be investigated further. This research offers insight into the mechanics of victim evidence at sentencing. The findings of this study have implications for lawyers, researchers, judges, victims, offenders, and other stakeholders in our legal systems. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

Criminology · Harm · Judicial opinion · Political science · Sentence · Sentencing guidelines · Statement (logic) · Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis · Jury Decision Making Processes · Law · Psychology · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending · Social Psychology

  • The Psychology of Victimhood in the Law

    Open Access•Kurt Gray, H Devine et al.•Policy Insights from the…•2026

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae