A national survey of child forensic interviewers

OBJECTIVE: We surveyed a national sample of child forensic interviewers to learn the types of information they wanted to have before interviewing children, their attitudes and beliefs about forensic interviews, the characteristics of their interviews, and their professional experiences. HYPOTHESES: We predicted (1) interviewers would want many different types of information before interviewing children, but specifically details about the child, alleged abuse, and disclosure, and that interviewers would find this information helpful and accessible; (2) interviewers would consider their own interviews to be neutral and nonleading and to yield accurate and complete information from children; interviewers' concern about false reports would be related to (3) the amount of preinterview information they wanted and (4) their years of experience and amount of training. METHOD: = 27) of a questionnaire that consisted of open- and closed-ended questions. RESULTS: (1) Interviewers wanted many different types of information before interviewing children, but most often information about the child, alleged abuse, and disclosure. They thought these types of information were the most helpful and very frequently had access to that information before interviewing. (2) Interviewers thought their interviews were fairly neutral, slightly leading, mostly accurate, and fairly complete. Interviewers who were more concerned about false denials (3) wanted more preinterview information than interviewers who were more concerned about false allegations and (4) had fewer years of experience. CONCLUSIONS: Our survey results underscore the need for future research examining the effects of preinterview information on forensic interviews and children's reports. They provide a current snapshot of forensic interviewing and a national benchmark to which local child advocacy centers can compare their practices. They highlight the inherent difficulty courts face when determining the admissibility of a child forensic interview based on its primary purpose. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved)

Child abuse · Forensic science · Interview · Legal psychology · Medical education · Poison control · Political science · Child Abuse and Trauma · Deception detection and forensic psychology · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Law · Medicine · Memory Processes and Influences · Psychology · Social Psychology

• Potential for police investigator bias

  Open Access•Nathanael E J Sumampouw, Corine De Ruiter et al.•Police Practice and Research•2022

  Add to list

• The forensic confirmation bias

  Open Access•Saul M Kassin, Itiel Dror et al.•Journal of Applied Research in…•2013

  Add to list

• How are we doing in soft psychology

  Robert Rosenthal•American Psychologist•1990

  Add to list

• Forty Years of Forensic Interviewing of Children Suspected of Sexual Abuse, 1974-2014

  Open Access•Kathleen Faller, Kathleen C Faller•Social Sciences•2014

  Add to list