Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Barriers and Facilitators to Implementing Holistic Admission Review in Graduate Advanced Nursing Programs

Bibliographic Data

ID21455780
AuthorsBrenda Wands, Jiale Hu (0000-0003-1993-8704, Virginia Commonwealth University), Beverly George-Gay (0000-0001-5999-6883), Amanda H Alley, Nicole Damico (0000-0003-3345-6939)
Year2023
Volume62
Issue10
Pages570-574
Publication date2023-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Nursing Education (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0148-4834 • E-ISSN: 1938-2421
PublisherSLACK, Inc (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.3928/01484834-20230815-10
PMID37812821
OpenAlexW4387445875
LanguageEN
References cited22

Background: There are strong recommendations and high demand for the use of holistic admission review (HAR). However, there is no study exploring and identifying barriers and facilitators to implementing HAR in health care education programs. Method: This qualitative descriptive study aimed to understand the key determinants influencing the integration of HAR in graduate advanced nursing programs. Two online focus groups with content analysis were used to identify barriers and facilitators. Results: The findings highlight 39 key determinants of HAR implementation in the graduate advanced nursing program; the determinants included four neutral influencing factors, 18 barriers, and 17 facilitators. These influencing factors aligned with all four domains in the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR) and with 20 of the 39 CFIR constructs. Conclusion: By taking into account the facilitators and barriers, graduate advanced nursing programs may use effective implementation strategies to integrate HAR changes and guide their evolving admissions processes. [ J Nurs Educ . 2023;62(10):570–574.]

Focus group · Graduate education · Health care · Implementation research · Medical education · Nursing research · Political science · Psychological intervention · Qualitative research · Sociology · Cultural Competency in Health Care · Medical Education and Admissions · Medicine · Nursing · Nursing education and management · Psychology

  • A systematic review of the use of the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research

    Open Access•M Alexis Kirk, Caitlin Kelley et al.•Implementation Science•2015

  • Choosing implementation strategies to address contextual barriers

    Open Access•Thomas J Waltz, Byron J Powell et al.•Implementation Science•2019

  • Context matters in implementation science

    Open Access•Phoebe Nilsen, Per Nilsen et al.•BMC Health Services Research•2019

  • The qualitative content analysis process

    Open Access•Satu Elo, Helvi Kyngäs•Journal of Advanced Nursing•2008

  • Using focus groups in medical education research

    Renée E Stalmeijer, Nancy McNaughton et al.•Medical Teacher•2014

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae