Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The phylogenetic position of Tshangla

A Reevaluation

Bibliographic Data

ID21458055
AuthorsPascal Gerber (0000-0003-2863-3507, University of Bern Institut für Sprachwissenschaft https://dx.doi.org/128937 Bern Switzerland), Selin GROLLMANN (0000-0003-1030-5222, University of Bern Institut für Sprachwissenschaft https://dx.doi.org/128937 Bern Switzerland)
Year2025
Pages1-27
Publication date2025-01-28
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueCahiers de linguistique - Asie orientale (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0153-3320 • E-ISSN: 1960-6028
PublisherWalter de Gruyter GmbH (PUBLISHER • DE)
DOI10.1163/19606028-bja10050
OpenAlexW4406956304
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited11

In the past, linguists such as Shafer (1955), Bradley (1997) and Noonan (2008) repeatedly assigned the Tshangla branch of the Trans-Himalayan language family a position close to Tibetan. However, no empirical evidence for this subgrouping has been brought forth, let alone shared innovations. Based on empirical data and the application of neogrammarian principles, this paper provides a reevaluation of the phylogenetic position of Tshangla. First, it is shown that Tshangla does not share the diagnostic innovations of Bodish sensu Hill (2019), i.e. Tibetan and East Bodish. Second, some first phonological, morphological and lexical innovations that define Tshangla as a subgroup of Trans-Himalayan are presented and the non-participation of Bodish in those is demonstrated. Finally, potential cognates for certain innovative features of Tshangla in other branches of Trans-Himalayan are discussed

Biology · Business · Evolutionary biology · Gene · Geography · Phylogenetic tree · Plant and animal studies · Plant and Fungal Species Descriptions · Yersinia bacterium, plague, ectoparasites research · Genetics

  • Proto-Tibetic *mbras ‘1grain; 2rice’

    Open Access•Joanna Bialek•Language and Linguistics 語言暨語言學•2026

  • Introduction to Sino-Tibetan

    Robert Shafer•Introduction to Sino-Tibetan•1969

  • Dated language phylogenies shed light on the ancestry of Sino-Tibetan

    Open Access•Laurent Sagart, Guillaume Jacques et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2019

  • The Oxford Handbook of Chinese Linguistics

    William S-y Wang, Chaofen Sun•Oxford Handbook of Chinese…•2015

  • The Six Vowel Hypothesis of Old Chinese in Comparative Context

    Nathan W Hill•Bulletin of Chinese Linguistics•2012

  • Bayesian phylogenetics illuminate shallower relationships among Trans-Himalayan languages in the Tibet-Arunachal area

    Open Access•Mei-Shin Wu, Timotheus A Bodt et al.•Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman…•2022

  • Areal features in Gongduk, Bjokapakha and Black Mountain Mönpa phonology

    Open Access•Pascal Gerber•Linguistics of the Tibeto-Burman…•2020

  • A Shared Suppletive Pattern in the Pronominal Systems of Chang Naga and Southern Qiang

    Guillaume Jacques•Cahiers de linguistique - Asie…•2007

  • The Classical Tibetan Language

    Ronald M Davidson, Stephan V Beyer•Philosophy East and West•1996

  • Sino-Tibetan a conspectus

    Open Access•Paul K Benedict, James A Matisoff•Sino-Tibetan•1972

  • What is Sino-Tibetan? Snapshot of a Field and a Language Family in Flux

    Open Access•Zev Handel•Language and Linguistics Compass•2008

Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae