Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Equality, plurality and democracy

Justifications of proposed constitutional settlements of the Northern Ireland conflict

Bibliographic Data

ID2145841
AuthorsJennifer Todd (0000-0002-4156-4393, a College Lecturer in Department of Politics , University College Dublin , Arts Building, Belfield, Dublin 4, Republic of Ireland)
Year1995
Volume18
Issue4
Pages818-836
Publication date1995-10-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueEthnic and Racial Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0141-9870 • E-ISSN: 1466-4356
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01419870.1995.9993892
OpenAlexW2068446372
LanguageEN
Citations received2
References cited9

Recent proposals for constitutional settlement of the Northern Ireland conflict have converged around the principles of equality, pluralism and democracy. The central philosophical problem is how to interpret and apply these principles. This article studies six settlement proposals from the New Ireland Forum Report of May 1984 to the Downing Street Declaration of December 1993. It argues that neither unionist integrationist nor regionalist proposals meet pluralist egalitarian principles on the constitutional issue. It identifies three approaches which meet these criteria. One, embodied in the Anglo-Irish Agreement and in one reading of the Downing Street Declaration takes equality to mean equal opportunity to have majority choice implemented, democracy to involve majority voting and pluralism to involve an undefined accommodation between the traditions. Another, embodied in a proposal for shared authority, argues for equality in the national character and cultural substance of the state, democracy as liberal self-determination for both majority and minority, and pluralism as absolute equality between the traditions. A third, embodied in an emancipatory reading of the Downing Street Declaration, takes equality as equal rights to consent to or veto any proposed settlement, democracy as a participatory process of dialogue and pluralism as agreement between the traditions as to a fair settlement. The article argues that a majoritarian concept of democracy sits uneasily with pluralist and egalitarian principles. Keywords: Northern Irelandpluralismdemocracyequalityconstitutional conflictconflict resolution

Declaration · Democracy · Epistemology · Pluralism (philosophy · Political science · Politics · Representative democracy · Sociology · Irish and British Studies · Law · Migration, Refugees, and Integration · Philosophy · Political Systems and Governance

  • Humespeak”

    Peter Mcloughlin•Peace and Conflict Studies•2008

  • The idea of an overlapping consensus in northern Ireland

    Shane O''Neill, Shane O’neill et al.•Irish Political Studies•1996

  • Ethnicity and Nationalism in Post-Imperial Britain

    Open Access•Harry Goulbourne•Ethnicity and Nationalism in…•1991

  • Territory and power in the United Kingdom

    Brian Porter•International Affairs•1984

  • Interpreting Northern Ireland

    John Whyte, John Henry Whyte et al.•Interpreting Northern Ireland•1990

  • The Politics of Antagonism

    Open Access•John E Finn•Political Science Quarterly•1994

  • Sound Stupidity

    Open Access•H Roberts•Government and Opposition•1987

  • Culture and Politics in Northern Ireland, 1960-1990

    Tamar Hager, Eamonn Hughes•Poetics Today•1992

  • The politics of antagonism

    Adrian Guelke•International Affairs•1993

Unique citing works2
Citations per year0,07
Citation span1996 - 2008 (13)
Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 2

Tools

Open DOISci-Hub
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae