Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

To What Extent Do Australian Government Metrics Align With Indigenous and Non‐Indigenous Conceptualisations of Wellbeing? A Scoping Review of Wellbeing Frameworks

Bibliographic Data

ID21458562
AuthorsSophie Wright-Pedersen (0000-0002-8794-018X, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health & Biosecurity Herston Queensland Australia, corresponding author), Edward J O'Connor (0000-0002-0808-5761, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health & Biosecurity Herston Queensland Australia), Megan A Rebuli (0000-0002-1934-5813, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health & Biosecurity Herston Queensland Australia), Tiana Thorne (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health & Biosecurity Herston Queensland Australia), Naomi Kakoschke (0000-0002-7394-5668, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health & Biosecurity Herston Queensland Australia), Ray Mahoney (0000-0002-6183-4071, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO), Health & Biosecurity Herston Queensland Australia)
Year2026
Publication date2026-06-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueAustralian Journal of Social Issues (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0157-6321 • E-ISSN: 1839-4655
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1002/ajs4.70117
OpenAlexW7163707376
LanguageEN
References cited35

Indigenous wellbeing theories offer potential to better measure social and cultural determinants. This scoping review aimed to identify the types of metrics used by the Australian government to assess wellbeing and evaluate the alignment of current frameworks against Indigenous and non‐Indigenous conceptualisations of wellbeing. This review was conducted according to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews. Searches were conducted in targeted government department websites, grey literature databases, and Advanced Google. Content analysis was used to categorise framework metrics according to Measuring What Matters and What Matters 2 Adults as respective Australian non‐Indigenous and Indigenous conceptualisations of wellbeing. Fifteen frameworks met the eligibility criteria. Numerous wellbeing measures currently being operationalised by Australian governments to assess population‐level wellbeing were extracted. A need to measure cultural determinants of wellbeing to a greater extent was identified. Agency and empowerment, central to Indigenous wellbeing concepts, are not currently incorporated into the Measuring What Matters national wellbeing framework. Findings also identified a need to develop definitions of wellbeing that extend beyond the concept of individual health or socioeconomic status. The outcomes of this review may inform and strengthen current and future Australian frameworks that aim to measure population‐wide wellbeing at the federal, state and territory levels

Grey literature · Indigenous · Project commissioning · Publishing · Socioeconomic status · Well-being · Indigenous Health and Education · Indigenous Health, Education, and Rights · Psychological Well-being and Life Satisfaction

  • Understanding health and illness

    Mason Durie•International Journal of…•2004

  • The PRISMA 2020 statement

    Open Access•Matthew J Page, Joanne E McKenzie et al.•BMJ•2021

  • On Happiness and Human Potentials

    Richard M Ryan, Edward L Deci•Annual Review of Psychology•2001

  • The Fabric of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Wellbeing

    Open Access•Gerald Garvey, K Anderson et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Indigenous and Non-Indigenous Theories of Wellbeing and Their Suitability for Wellbeing Policy

    Open Access•Tamara Mackean, Madison Shakespeare et al.•International Journal of…•2022

  • What Matters 2 Adults (WM2Adults)

    Open Access•Gerald Garvey, K Anderson et al.•International Journal of…•2021

  • Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander people's domains of wellbeing

    Open Access•Tamara Butler, Kate Anderson et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2019

  • Social and emotional wellbeing assessment instruments for use with Indigenous Australians

    Open Access•Michael Le Grande, Chantal F Ski et al.•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • Indigenous research methodology – weaving a research interface

    Courtney Ryder, Tamara Mackean et al.•International Journal of Social…•2019

  • Indigenous Knowledge Within a Global Knowledge System

    Open Access•Mason Durie•Higher Education Policy•2005

  • Wellbeing economy

    Open Access•Lorenzo Fioramonti, Luca Coscieme et al.•Ecological Economics•2021

  • Advancing our understanding of mental wellbeing and mental health

    Open Access•Joep van Agteren, Joep Agteren et al.•Australian Psychologist•2019

  • An Indigenous Strengths-based Theoretical Framework

    Open Access•Jacob Prehn•Australian Social Work•2024

  • The Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) and Indigenous Peoples

    Mandy Li-Ming Yap, Krushil Watene•Journal of Human Development•2019

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae