Is anti-ligature an automatic requirement for suicide prevention
Assessing legal obligations in alternative mental health crisis services
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21458926 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Joshua Finn (La Trobe University), Piers Gooding (0000-0001-5743-5708, La Trobe University), Lisa Brophy (0000-0001-6460-3490, La Trobe University), Deb Carlon (Ridley College), Chris Maylea (0000-0003-3688-0487, La Trobe University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 105 |
| Pages | 102182 |
| Publication date | 2026-03-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0160-2527 • E-ISSN: 1873-6386 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102182 |
| PMID | 41506150 |
| OpenAlex | W7118549689 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 57 |
Around the world, peer-run, bed-based services that offer voluntary support to people experiencing mental health crisis are emerging as alternatives to hospital-based mental healthcare. In Victoria, Australia, where these 'alternative crisis services' are expanding, a key legal question has arisen: must non-coercive settings adopt the suicide prevention architectural design (or 'anti-ligature design') mandated in psychiatric wards under negligence and occupational health and safety laws? This article answers that question through a three-stage study: (1) a doctrinal analysis of Victorian case law and statutes that shape duties to prevent suicide; (2) a narrative review of evidence on anti-ligature measures in hospital environments; and (3) thematic analysis of interviews with clinicians, designers, peer leaders and legal experts (n = 12). The findings indicate that empirical evidence only associates anti-ligature design with reduced suicide rates when paired with search, detention and close observation powers, which are absent from alternative crisis services. There was no evidence identified that anti-ligature design will reduce suicide in settings which do not also implement these practices. This absence of data does not justify retreat to institutional templates, especially considering key differences in the care models that differentiate alternative crisis services from traditional hospital-based offerings. Interviewees warned that conspicuous anti-ligature hardware can undermine the therapeutic value of alternative crisis services, and merely displace, rather than prevent, suicidal behaviour. Wholesale transplantation of hospital anti-ligature standards into alternative crisis services is therefore unlikely to satisfy the 'reasonableness' test and may contravene the therapeutic mandate of services. Instead, this study calls for regulators to endorse context-specific standards for mental health service design, some of which may require further empirical research on rights-based, peer-led safety strategies
Crisis intervention · Health care · Mandate · Mental health · Mental illness · Poison control · Statute · Suicide prevention · Thematic analysis · Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints · Psychiatric care and mental health services · Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Suicide Rates After Discharge From Psychiatric Facilities
“Hey Amir, How Are You Really Doing?”
How Inpatient Psychiatric Units Can Be Both Safe and Therapeutic
When Should Inpatient Psychiatric Care Include Access to the Outdoors, Despite Elopement or Other Risks
Why Patient-Centered Built Environment Standards Matter More Than Numbers of Beds in Inpatient Psychiatry
What Does the History of Inpatient Psychiatric Unit Design Tell Us About Balancing Safety and Healing for Patients With Suicidal Behaviors
How Should Suicide Prevention and Healing Be Expressed as Goals of Inpatient Psychiatric Unit Design
Suicide in Psychiatric Inpatients— A Case–Control Study
Peer Intervention following Suicide-Related Emergency Department Presentation
Informing and Sustaining Participation of Lived Experience in the Suicide Prevention Workforce
| Highly cited | No |
|---|