Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Criminal responsibility and mental disorder

Why do heterogeneous constructs not overlap

Bibliographic Data

ID21458987
AuthorsLinda Gröning (0000-0003-2864-3545, Haukeland University Hospital, corresponding author), Kenneth Hugdahl (0000-0002-0008-4326, Haukeland University Hospital)
Year2026
Volume108
Pages102236
Publication date2026-09-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueInternational Journal of Law and Psychiatry (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0160-2527 • E-ISSN: 1873-6386
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.ijlp.2026.102236
PMID42190334
OpenAlexW7162437075
LanguageEN
References cited40

This paper discusses some problems in associating definitions and judgments of criminal unaccountability, e.g. criminal insanity, to psychiatric constructs, i.e., diagnoses, symptoms and related constructs of functional impairment. The aim is to highlight this relationship as to why it is inevitably challenging at a conceptual level. The backdrop of the paper is that the dependence between legal and psychiatric constructs challenges constitutional values of legal certainty and equality before law. The authors propose that to understand and possibly address this challenge, one must acknowledge the heterogeneity of psychiatric constructs and the intricate relationships between diagnoses, symptoms and functional impairment of argued legal relevance. Moreover, one must acknowledge that legal constructs of criminal unaccountability and psychiatric constructs of mental disorders are different ways of categorizing complex phenomena for different purposes, making the overlap between them epistemologically challenging. It is not expected that either the court or the experts are aware of such issues, which could lead to unwanted biases. In the paper, the key perspectives that shape these issues are outlined and discussed

Criminal justice · Criminal responsibility · Mental health · Occupational safety and health · Poison control · Suicide prevention · Free Will and Agency · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Mental Health and Psychiatry · Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending

  • Differences in voice-hearing experiences of people with psychosis in the USA, India and Ghana

    Open Access•T M Luhrmann, R Padmavati et al.•The British Journal of Psychiatry•2015

  • The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for Schizophrenia

    Stanley R Kay, Abraham Fiszbein et al.•Schizophrenia Bulletin•1987

  • Structured instruments for insanity defense evaluations

    Open Access•Giovanna Parmigiani, Gabriele Mandarelli et al.•Behavioral Sciences & the Law•2023

  • Remodelling criminal insanity

    Open Access•Linda Gröning, Unn K Haukvik et al.•International Journal of Law and…•2022

  • Special criminal sanctions for offenders with mental disorders

    Open Access•Linda Gröning, Slavka Dimitrova•International Journal of Law and…•2024

  • Criminal insanity in Bulgaria and Norway

    Open Access•Linda Gröning, Slavka Dimitrova•International Journal of Law and…•2023

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae