A case study of forensic psychiatry experts' reports analysis through large language models
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21458993 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Giulia Petroni (0000-0002-1563-7739, Sapienza University of Rome, corresponding author), Salvatore Alaimo (0000-0001-6486-5837, University of Catania), Gabriele Mandarelli (0000-0003-4887-5108, University of Bari Aldo Moro), Roberto Catanesi (0000-0003-1691-6366, University of Bari Aldo Moro), Cinzia Niolu (0000-0001-6173-2684, University of Rome Tor Vergata), Alberto Siracusano (0000-0001-8406-093X, University of Rome Tor Vergata), Alfredo Pulvirenti (0000-0002-9764-0295, University of Catania) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 102 |
| Pages | 102122 |
| Publication date | 2025-09-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0160-2527 • E-ISSN: 1873-6386 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.ijlp.2025.102122 |
| PMID | 40516226 |
| OpenAlex | W4411260652 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 27 |
Forensic psychiatry · Forensic science · Medical emergency · Poison control · Psychiatry · Computational and Text Analysis Methods · Human Factors and Ergonomics · Medicine · Mental Health via Writing · Psychology · Topic Modeling
Evaluating the Feasibility of ChatGPT in Healthcare
Stop explaining black box machine learning models for high stakes decisions and use interpretable models instead
The Mythos of Model Interpretability
Neuroscience-based Psychiatric Assessments of Criminal Responsibility
Factors related to bias in forensic psychiatric assessments in criminal matters
Experts' decision-making processes in Swedish forensic psychiatric investigations
The decision-making process in Swedish forensic psychiatric investigations
Cognitive biases in forensic psychiatry
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |