What Students Value Most
A Qualitative Examination of Learner Experiences in a Fully Online Degree Program
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21459770 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Lam D Pham (0000-0001-8031-7777, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA, corresponding author), Gage F Matthews (0000-0002-8695-9727, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, USA), Xiu Cravens (0000-0002-3077-9313, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, NC, USA) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 124 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 143-169 |
| Publication date | 2022-02-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0161-4681 • E-ISSN: 1467-9620 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/01614681221086460 |
| OpenAlex | W4280536608 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 30 |
Background: Enrollment in online degree programs has grown rapidly in U.S. higher education institutions, but much of the research on online learning draws from student experiences in a singular online course. Student experiences in fully online programs likely differ from the experience of taking a one-off online class, especially as students become more familiar with online learning after multiple courses. Yet, research examining student experiences in fully online programs remains sparse. Objective: In this exploratory and theory-building study, we examine student experiences after they have taken multiple courses in a fully online degree program. Relying on the perspective of students, our goal is to better understand what elements of fully online learning programs are most valued by learners. Setting: We examine a fully online EdD program in leadership and learning at a private university in the United States. The program includes a series of courses that all include both asynchronous (e.g., readings and lecture videos) and synchronous activities. For synchronous sessions, students log in with their computers every week using teleconferencing software that allows them to interact with the instructor and with classmates in real time. Research Design: We qualitatively analyze student interview data. We employ the How People Learn Framework to guide our analysis and extend our understanding of two of its key learning-environment dimensions: the learner-centered and community-centered dimensions. We purposively sampled 31 students for the semistructured interviews. To analyze interview transcripts, we used a grounded theory approach that began with line-by-line codes that we aggregated into categorical tags that were used to support the emergent themes. Results: We find that students value four learner-centered program characteristics (diversity, authenticity, safety, and individuality) and five community-centered program structures (facilitating peer-to-peer interactions, establishing norms and expectations, differentiating for learning preferences, explaining the strengths and limitations of technology, and supporting student-driven initiatives). Conclusion: We discuss cognitive tensions in students’ self-reported perceptions of their experiences and highlight the need for future research to examine how online learning programs can be better structured to support students in diverse and inclusive learning communities
Asynchronous communication · Distance education · Grounded theory · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Online learning · Pedagogy · Qualitative research · Sociology · Computer Science · E-Learning and Knowledge Management · Online and Blended Learning · Online Learning and Analytics · Psychology
Virtual Classrooms
Critical Inquiry in a Text-Based Environment
How do online course design features influence student performance?
Academic motivation and self-regulation
Engagement Matters
Measuring self-regulation in online and blended learning environments
Researcher Positionality - A Consideration of Its Influence and Place in Qualitative Research - A New Researcher Guide
Are We Asking the Right Questions? Using Cognitive Interviews to Improve Surveys in Education Research
The first decade of the community of inquiry framework
The Effectiveness of Online and Blended Learning
Effects of course modality in summer session
A systematic review of research on online teaching and learning from 2009 to 2018
A Coefficient of Agreement for Nominal Scales
Self-regulation in online learning
Qualitative inquiry and research design
Can Online Courses Deliver In-class Results
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |