The tension between abstraction and specificity in enacting reflexivity in race scholarship
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2146178 |
|---|---|
| Authors | M Pattillo (0000-0003-0717-169X, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2012 |
| Volume | 35 |
| Issue | 4 |
| Pages | 620-625 |
| Publication date | 2012-04-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethnic and Racial Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-9870 • E-ISSN: 1466-4356 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01419870.2011.632427 |
| OpenAlex | W2034589669 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 4 |
Emirbayer and Desmond (2012; hereafter ED) intend for their exposition on race and reflexivity to be prescriptive. Moreover, they propose quite high stakes, 'such that there come to be real sanctio
Abstraction · Art · Epistemology · Exposition (narrative · Political science · Race (biology · Reflexivity · Scholarship · Sociology · Anthropology · Critical Race Theory in Education · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics · Social and Cultural Dynamics
| Citation velocity | historical |
|---|---|
| Highly cited | No |