How to be (non-)specific
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21462010 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Marco Degano (Amsterdam University College, autor correspondente), Maria Aloni (0000-0002-8194-1173, Amsterdam University College) |
| Ano | 2025 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Fascículo | 5-6 |
| Páginas | 955-1003 |
| Data de publicação | 2025-12-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Sim |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | Linguistics and Philosophy (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0165-0157 • E-ISSN: 1573-0549 |
| Editora | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10988-025-09442-y |
| OpenAlex | W4416097238 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Citações recebidas | 1 |
| Referências citadas | 58 |
Indefinites are known to give rise to different scopal (specific vs. non-specific) and epistemic (known vs. unknown) uses. Farkas and Brasoveanu (Wiley Blackwell Compan. Semant. 1–26, 2020) explain these specificity distinctions in terms of stability vs. variability in value assignments of the variable introduced by the indefinite. Typological research (Haspelmath in Indefinite pronouns. Oxford University Press, 1997) shows that indefinites have different functional distributions with respect to these uses. In this work, we present a formal framework where Farkas and Brasoveanu (Wiley Blackwell Compan. Semant. 1–26, 2020’s) ideas are rigorously formalized. We develop a two-sorted team semantics that integrates both scope and epistemic effects. We apply the framework to explain the typological variety of indefinites, showing that only lexicalized indefinites have convex meanings in our system (Gärdenfors in The geometry of meaning: semantics based on conceptual spaces. MIT Press, 2014; Steinert-Threlkeld et al. Semant. Pragmat. 16:1-EA, 2023). We account for the restricted distribution and licensing conditions of different indefinites, and we focus on a particular class of indefinites, called epistemic indefinites (Alonso-Ovalle and Menéndez-Benito in Epistemic indefinites: exploring modality beyond the verbal domain. Oxford University Press, 2015)
Philosophy of language · Truth condition · Categorization, perception, and language · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation
Logic in Grammar
Inquisitive Semantics
The Geometry of Meaning
Defaults in update semantics
Referential and quantificational indefinites
Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites?
Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites
Generalized quantifiers and natural language
Quantifier Scope
Projecting Possibilities in the Nominal Domain
Epistemic Specificity from a Communication-Theoretic Perspective
Singleton Indefinites
Ease of learning explains semantic universals
Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese
Wh-questions in dynamic inquisitive semantics
A semantic universal for modality
Sentence-internal "same" and its quantificational licensors
Connectedness as a constraint on exhaustification
Logic and conversation
From IF to BI
Compositionality I
Dynamic predicate logic
Modal indefinites
The scope of indefinites
Two Views on Epistemic Indefinites
Compositionality II
| Obras citantes distintas | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citações por ano | 1 |
| Intervalo de citações | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Velocidade de citação | current |
| Altamente citado | Não |
| Tipos de citação | Neutras: 1 |