Pular para o conteúdo principal

ETHNOS_APP

Início • Busca • Periódicos • Lista 0

How to be (non-)specific

Dados Bibliográficos

ID21462010
AutoresMarco Degano (Amsterdam University College, autor correspondente), Maria Aloni (0000-0002-8194-1173, Amsterdam University College)
Ano2025
Volume48
Fascículo5-6
Páginas955-1003
Data de publicação2025-12-01
Peer ReviewedSim
Open AccessSim
TipoARTICLE
PeriódicoLinguistics and Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores do periódicoISSN: 0165-0157 • E-ISSN: 1573-0549
EditoraSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10988-025-09442-y
OpenAlexW4416097238
IdiomaEN
Citações recebidas1
Referências citadas58

Indefinites are known to give rise to different scopal (specific vs. non-specific) and epistemic (known vs. unknown) uses. Farkas and Brasoveanu (Wiley Blackwell Compan. Semant. 1–26, 2020) explain these specificity distinctions in terms of stability vs. variability in value assignments of the variable introduced by the indefinite. Typological research (Haspelmath in Indefinite pronouns. Oxford University Press, 1997) shows that indefinites have different functional distributions with respect to these uses. In this work, we present a formal framework where Farkas and Brasoveanu (Wiley Blackwell Compan. Semant. 1–26, 2020’s) ideas are rigorously formalized. We develop a two-sorted team semantics that integrates both scope and epistemic effects. We apply the framework to explain the typological variety of indefinites, showing that only lexicalized indefinites have convex meanings in our system (Gärdenfors in The geometry of meaning: semantics based on conceptual spaces. MIT Press, 2014; Steinert-Threlkeld et al. Semant. Pragmat. 16:1-EA, 2023). We account for the restricted distribution and licensing conditions of different indefinites, and we focus on a particular class of indefinites, called epistemic indefinites (Alonso-Ovalle and Menéndez-Benito in Epistemic indefinites: exploring modality beyond the verbal domain. Oxford University Press, 2015)

Philosophy of language · Truth condition · Categorization, perception, and language · Philosophy and Theoretical Science · Syntax, Semantics, Linguistic Variation

  • Not all coexpressions are syncretisms

    Open Access•Gleb Bubnov•Glossa a journal of general…•2026

  • Logic in Grammar

    Gennaro Chierchia•Logic in Grammar•2013

  • Inquisitive Semantics

    Open Access•Ivano Ciardelli, Jeroen Groenendijk et al.•Inquisitive Semantics•2018

  • The Geometry of Meaning

    Peter Gärdenfors•Geometry of Meaning•2014

  • Defaults in update semantics

    Open Access•Frank Veltman•Journal of Philosophical Logic•1996

  • Referential and quantificational indefinites

    Open Access•Janet Dean Fodor, Ivan A Sag•Linguistics and Philosophy•1982

  • Scope or Pseudoscope? Are there Wide-Scope Indefinites?

    Angelika Kratzer•Events and Grammar•1998

  • Choice Functions and the Scopal Semantics of Indefinites

    Open Access•Yoad Winter•Linguistics and Philosophy•1997

  • Generalized quantifiers and natural language

    Open Access•Jon Barwise, Robin Cooper•Linguistics and Philosophy•1981

  • Quantifier Scope

    Open Access•Tanya Reinhart•Linguistics and Philosophy•1997

  • Projecting Possibilities in the Nominal Domain

    Luis Alonso-Ovalle, Luis Alonso‐ovalle et al.•Journal of Semantics•2018

  • Epistemic Specificity from a Communication-Theoretic Perspective

    Open Access•Hans Kamp, Ágnes Bende-Farkas•Journal of Semantics•2019

  • Singleton Indefinites

    R Schwarzschild•Journal of Semantics•2002

  • Ease of learning explains semantic universals

    Open Access•Shane Steinert‐Threlkeld, Jakub Szymanik•Cognition•2020

  • Indefinite Wh in Mandarin Chinese

    Open Access•P Li, Yen-Hui Audrey Li•Journal of East Asian Linguistics•1992

  • Wh-questions in dynamic inquisitive semantics

    Open Access•Floris Roelofsen, Jakub Dotlačil•Theoretical Linguistics•2023

  • A semantic universal for modality

    Open Access•Shane Steinert-Threlkeld, Shane Steinert‐Threlkeld et al.•Semantics and Pragmatics•2023

  • Sentence-internal "same" and its quantificational licensors

    Open Access•Adrian Brasoveanu, Jakub Dotlačil•Semantics and Pragmatics•2015

  • Connectedness as a constraint on exhaustification

    Open Access•Émile Enguehard, Emmanuel Chemla•Linguistics and Philosophy•2019

  • Logic and conversation

    Open Access•Maria Aloni•Semantics and Pragmatics•2022

  • From IF to BI

    Open Access•Samson Abramsky, Jouko Väänänen•Synthese•2009

  • Compositionality I

    Open Access•Peter Pagin, Dag Westerståhl•Philosophy Compass•2010

  • Dynamic predicate logic

    Open Access•Jeroen Groenendijk, Martin Stokhof•Linguistics and Philosophy•1991

  • Modal indefinites

    Open Access•Luis Alonso-Ovalle, Luis Alonso‐ovalle et al.•Natural Language Semantics•2010

  • The scope of indefinites

    Open Access•Tania Ionin•Natural Language Semantics•2010

  • Two Views on Epistemic Indefinites

    Open Access•Luis Alonso‐ovalle, Paula Menéndez‐benito•Language and Linguistics Compass•2013

  • Compositionality II

    Open Access•Peter Pagin, Dag Westerståhl•Philosophy Compass•2010

Obras citantes distintas1
Citações por ano1
Intervalo de citações2026 - 2026 (1)
Velocidade de citaçãocurrent
Altamente citadoNão
Tipos de citaçãoNeutras: 1
Ethnos_APP • Projeto Open Source • Licença MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidade e Cookies • Documentação da API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código da API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código do Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae