Deliberating or Stalling for Justice? Dynamics of Corporate Remediation and Victim Resistance Through the Lens of Parentalism
The Fundão dam Collapse and the Renova Foundation in Brazil
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21464635 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Rajiv Maher (0000-0001-9721-0626, Tecnológico de Monterrey, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 178 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 15-36 |
| Publication date | 2022-06-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Business Ethics (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0167-4544 • E-ISSN: 1573-0697 |
| Publisher | Springer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1007/s10551-021-04803-6 |
| OpenAlex | W3154722789 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 8 |
| References cited | 41 |
Using the political corporate social responsibility (PCSR) lens of parentalism, this paper investigates the more subtle and less-visible interactional dynamics and strategies of power, resistance and justification that manifest between a multi-stakeholder-governed foundation and victims of a mining corporation’s dam collapse. The Renova Foundation was established to provide remedy through a deliberative approach to hundreds of thousands of victims from Brazil’s worst socio-environmental disaster—the collapse of Samarco Mining Corporation’s Fundão tailings dam. Data were collected from a combination of fieldwork and archival analysis to assess the perceptions of victims, their defenders and foundation executives. The findings reveal 12 dialectical tensions from Renova’s attempts to remedy the victim’s injustices. The case analysis contributes through proposing a dialectical process model of stakeholder resistance and subversion to parentalist PCSR. The case reveals the pivotal use of time via the act of stalling as a strategic resource to exhaust victims and reach settlements. Furthermore, organizations justify their parentalism by blaming delays on the bureaucracy and shared responsibility of multi-stakeholder deliberation. Ultimately, I contend that victims must have an equal voice in the outcome of their remediation and that businesses responsible for causing harm should not decide these matters
Corporation · Harm · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Stakeholder · Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting · Global trade, sustainability, and social impact · Law · Mining and Resource Management · Public Administration
Participation Strategies and Ethical Considerations in NGO Led Community-Based Conservation Initiatives
Theorizing Effective (Preventative) Remedy
Rightsholder-Driven Remedy for Business-Related Human Rights Abuse
Navigating Contestation at the Corporate–Community Boundary
Engaging Marginalized Stakeholders
Deliberative ideals and hegemonic practices – political CSR in extractive industries
Repoliticizing spirituality
Violações de direitos humanos pela Fundação Renova
Methodological fit in management field research
Conflict and Astroturfing in Niyamgiri
The Politics of Multi-Stakeholder Initiatives
Toward a political conception of corporate responsibility
The Private Regulation of Global Corporate Conduct
Deliberative Democracy or Agonistic Pluralism?
For the English to See
Whose Land Is It Anyway? National Interest, Indigenous Stakeholders, and Colonial Discourses
Challenging extractivism
Determining Criteria to Evaluate Outcomes of Businesses’ Provision of Remedy
Company-created remedy mechanisms for serious human rights abuses
Transnational power and translocal governance
Critical essay
On the pragmatics of communication
Legitimacy and the Privatization of Environmental Governance
Cadê a minha cidade, ou o impacto da tragédia da Samarco na vida dos moradores de Bento Rodrigues
Toxic Waste Siting and Community Resistance
| Unique citing works | 8 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 4 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 8 |