Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

The All-Stakeholders-Considered Case for Corporate Beneficence

Bibliographic Data

ID21465163
AuthorsGastón de los Reyes (0000-0001-8647-2452, Glasgow Caledonian University, corresponding author)
Year2023
Volume188
Issue1
Pages37-55
Publication date2023-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Business Ethics (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-4544 • E-ISSN: 1573-0697
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10551-022-05224-9
PMID36320555
OpenAlexW4307358482
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited52

In ways accentuated by the global coronavirus pandemic, corporations constitute vital instruments of the acts of beneficence needed by the people of the world to make progress in public health and increase collective and individual well-being. This article contributes to understanding the variety of moral forces that may lead corporations to commit acts of beneficence, including Friedman’s business case for corporate beneficence, the duty of beneficence as developed by business ethicists, and Dunfee’s social contract account of corporate obligation. Whereas Mejia recently contributed to scholarship on corporate beneficence by expressly adopting shareholder primacy’s conception of corporate governance, this article embraces a stakeholder-oriented, managerialist picture of corporate governance. I extend the literature on beneficence by incorporating what I argue is the intuition underlying Dunfee’s contractualist formula of minimal contribution, namely that management’s duty to do good is awakened and unshackled to the extent management judges the corporation can afford to commit acts of beneficence, all stakeholders considered. The all-stakeholders-considered case for corporate beneficence compels management to act, I argue, when inaction would undermine the moral integrity of managers personally committed to promoting the well-being of humanity

Autonomy · Beneficence · Business · Business ethics · Corporate governance · Corporate social responsibility · Duty · Law and economics · Political science · Public relations · Sociology · Ethics in Business and Education · Law · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment

  • Purpose-washing? The strategic role of rhetoric

    Open Access•Gianluca Gionfriddo, Francesco Testa et al.•Long Range Planning•2026

  • Ethical Decision Making by Individuals in Organizations

    Thomas M Jones•Academy of Management Review•1991

  • Nicomachean Ethics

    Aristotle Aristotle, Aristotle  et al.•Clarendon Aristotle Series:…•1999

  • Managing for stakeholders, stakeholder utility functions, and competitive advantage

    Open Access•Jeffrey S Harrison, Douglas A Bosse et al.•Strategic Management Journal•2010

  • Toward a Theory of Stakeholder Identification and Salience

    Ronald K Mitchell, Bradley R Agle et al.•Academy of Management Review•1997

  • An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations

    Adam C Smith, Adam Smith et al.•Glasgow Edition of the Works and…•1776

  • Corporate Duties of Virtue

    Jeffery Smith•Kantian Business Ethics•2012

  • The Bystander in Commercial Life

    Open Access•Wim Dubbink•Journal of Business Ethics•2018

  • The Social Responsibility of Business Is to Increase Its Profits

    Milton Friedman•Corporate Ethics and Corporate…•2007

  • Rescuing Justice and Equality

    G A Cohen•Rescuing Justice and Equality•2008

  • Human Welfare and Moral Worth

    Thomas E Hill, Jr Thomas E Hill•Human welfare and moral worth•2002

Unique citing works1
Citations per year1
Citation span2026 - 2026 (1)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae