Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Rights and Demands

A Response to Kamm

Bibliographic Data

ID21466019
AuthorsMargaret Gilbert (0000-0001-9392-3012, University of California, Irvine, corresponding author)
Year2025
Volume44
Issue1
Pages1-12
Publication date2025-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLaw and Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0167-5249 • E-ISSN: 1573-0522
PublisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLC (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1007/s10982-024-09519-y
OpenAlexW4406110420
LanguageEN

I respond to some questions raised by Frances Kamm with respect to my book Rights and Demands (2018). The book focuses on demand-rights and asks how we accrue them. In other words, how does one accrue the standing to demand an action of someone or rebuke them for non-performance? My response to Kamm emphasizes how I understand “directed duties” in this context. Contrary to the standard practice of rights theorists, I do not start from the assumption that directed duties are constituted by “plain” duties in the context of other factors (about which rights theorists disagree). Rather, I understand my duty to you as the correlative and equivalent of your standing to demand the action in question. I offer a number of further clarifications and conclude by distinguishing the targets of my discussion from other phenomena of interest to moral philosophers, such as complaining and blaming

Comparative law · Duty · Law and economics · Philosophy of law · Political philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Free Will and Agency · History · Law · Political Philosophy and Ethics · War, Ethics, and Justification

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae