Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Induced demand in kidney replacement therapy

Bibliographic Data

ID21467244
AuthorsSteef Redeker (0000-0002-1613-7859, Erasmus MC, corresponding author), Emma K Massey (0000-0002-9017-1924, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Ruben G van Merweland, Ruben van Merweland (0000-0001-6814-5781, Erasmus MC), Willem Weimar (0000-0003-0352-4259, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute), Sohal Y Ismail (Erasmus MC), Jan J V Busschbach (0000-0002-8602-0381, Erasmus MC)
Year2022
Volume126
Issue10
Pages1062-1068
Publication date2022-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0168-8510 • E-ISSN: 1872-6054
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.07.011
PMID35941055
OpenAlexW4288809001
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited50

There are three notable aspects of the current kidney replacement therapy program. First, the number of patients on home dialysis has dropped substantially over the last decades. Second, the rate of transplantation has stabilized in recent years. Third, there is variation in referral rate for transplantation among hospitals. These trends are the result of overutilization of in-center dialysis and that demand for kidney replacement therapy is moderated by suppliers. Current healthcare policy leads to overutilization of in-center dialysis and underutilization of home dialysis and transplantation. This overutilization is the result of supplier-induced demand and leads to suboptimal care for patients and excessive healthcare expenditures. The main drivers of this overutilization are the overcapacity of in-center dialysis beds and the high financial disincentives on empty dialysis beds. Policymakers should address this by reducing dialysis capacity and increasing the capacity of transplantation facilities. This is the first attempt to address the overutilization and the nonalignment of supply and demand by looking at the capacity of in-center dialysis and the financial disincentives for physicians on empty in-center dialysis beds. In our analysis, we conclude that limiting the capacity of in-center dialysis beds is the most effective strategy to better align supply and demand, which will result in better patient outcomes and lower societal costs

Dialysis · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Intensive care medicine · Kidney transplantation · Limiting · Patient choice · Referral · Renal replacement therapy · Adolescent and Pediatric Healthcare · Dialysis and Renal Disease Management · Healthcare Policy and Management · Medicine · Nursing · Surgery · Transplantation

  • Pre-emptive living donor kidney transplantation

    Open Access•Isaac Kim, Umberto Maggiore et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Kidney transplantation versus maintenance dialysis in 14 EU countries

    Open Access•Horia Iuga, Mehmet Ali Balcı et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2026

  • Examining supplier-induced demand under regulated fees

    Open Access•Cyrus Alinia, Hasan Yusefzadeh•Health Policy and Planning•2026

  • Reference Incomes, Loss Aversion, and Physician Behavior

    John A Rizzo, Richard Zeckhauser et al.•The Review of Economics and…•2003

  • Physicians’ responses to financial and social incentives

    Open Access•Mylene Lagarde, Duane Blaauw•Social Science & Medicine•2017

  • Measuring kidney patients' motivation to pursue living donor kidney transplant

    Open Access•Amy D Waterman, Mark L Robbins et al.•Journal of Health Psychology•2015

Citations per year1
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae