Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Payments reported by the pharmaceutical industry in Ireland from 2015 to 2019

An observational study

Bibliographic Data

ID21467529
AuthorsFrank Moriarty (0000-0001-9838-3625, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, corresponding author), James Larkins (0000-0003-4339-5623), James Larkin (0000-0001-5569-9523), Tom Fahey (0000-0002-5896-5783)
Year2021
Volume125
Issue10
Pages1297-1304
Publication date2021-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0168-8510 • E-ISSN: 1872-6054
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.07.016
PMID34429238
OpenAlexW3192973710
LanguageEN
Citations received4
References cited34

BACKGROUND: The pharmaceutical industry makes large numbers of payments to healthcare organisations (HCOs) and healthcare professionals (HCPs). Ireland has a large pharmaceutical industry presence and national debate on legislating for greater industry payment transparency. This study characterises payments in Ireland to HCPs and HCOs during 2015-2019, and the content, consistency and methodology of the data source. METHODS: An observational study of TransfersOfValue.ie, the disclosure website for the Irish Pharmaceutical Health Association pharmaceutical companies. We conducted a quantitative analysis, summarising payments to HCOs, HCPs and for research and development (R&D). We quantified disclosure rates of names for HCP and HCO payment recipients. We also conducted a content analysis of the methodology notes and website content. RESULTS: Payments totalling €163 million were reported by 47 companies during 2015-2019, €84.6 million for R&D, with non-R&D payments of €45.1 million to HCOs and €33.6 million to HCPs. HCOs were named for 91.2% of payments, and HCPs for 55.1-62.8% across study years. For 2019, ten companies disclosed >€1 million in payments, and three disclosed >€1 million in HCO and HCP payments. Content analysis of 132 data reports and 46 methodology notes indicated substantial variation in methodologies for reporting between companies. CONCLUSIONS: There are substantial payments in Ireland, often the recipient is undisclosed, and companies differ in their reporting. A mandatory disclosure system could enhance transparency

Business · Conflict of interest · Economic growth · Economics · Health care · Irish · Observational study · Payment · Pharmaceutical industry · Political science · Law · Medicine · Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy · Pharmaceutical industry and healthcare · Pharmacovigilance and Adverse Drug Reactions · Accounting · Finance · Marketing · Pharmacology

  • Commercial influences on patient and public involvement

    Open Access•Marita Hennessy, Tom Fahey et al.•Health Promotion International•2024

  • Interaction between physicians and the pharmaceutical industry

    Open Access•Ehsan Zarei, Amir Ghaffari et al.•Frontiers in Public Health•2023

  • Advancing international comparison of pharmaceutical industry funding of patient advocacy

    Open Access•Shai Mulinari, Dylan Pashley et al.•Health Policy•2022

  • International comparison of pharmaceutical industry payment disclosures in the UK and Japan

    Open Access•Piotr Ozieranski, Hiroaki Saito et al.•Globalization and Health•2023

  • Pharmaceutical industry self-regulation and non-transparency

    Open Access•Shai Mulinari, Luc Martinon et al.•Health Policy•2021

Citations per year1
Citation span2022 - 2024 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae