Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Cost-effectiveness of home-based stroke rehabilitation across Europe

A modelling study

Bibliographic Data

ID21467672
AuthorsPaolo Candio (0000-0003-1521-088X, University of Birmingham), Mara Violato (0000-0002-0484-7706, University of Oxford), Ramon Luengo-Fernandez (0000-0002-2118-2662, University of Oxford, corresponding author), José Leal (0000-0001-7870-6730, University of Oxford)
Year2022
Volume126
Issue3
Pages183-189
Publication date2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueHealth Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0168-8510 • E-ISSN: 1872-6054
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.healthpol.2022.01.007
PMID35065824
OpenAlexW4205774811
LanguageEN
References cited29

The aim of this study was to explore the cost-effectiveness of home-based versus centre-based rehabilitation in stroke patients across Europe. A state-transition cohort model was developed to simulate the impact of the intervention in 32 European countries. A cost-utility analysis was conducted from a societal perspective including healthcare, social care and informal care costs, and productivity losses. Health outcomes were expressed as QALYs. Sensitivity analyses were conducted concerning model input values and structural assumptions. Data were obtained from a population-based cohort and previously published studies. Across Europe, over 855,000 patients with stroke would be eligible for rehabilitation in 2017. Europe-wide implementation of home-based rehabilitation was estimated to produce 61,888 additional QALYs (95% CI: 3,609 to 118,679) and cost savings of €237 million (95% CI: -237 to 1,764) and of €352 million (95% CI: -340 to 2,237) in health- and social-care and societal costs, respectively. Under base case assumptions, home-based rehabilitation was found highly likely to be cost-effective (>90%), compared to centre-based rehabilitation, in most European countries (29 out of 32). Evidence from this study suggests that a shift from a centre-based to a home-based approach to stroke rehabilitation is likely to be good value for money in most European countries. Further research should be conducted to assess the generalisability of these findings to local settings

Cohort · Cost effectiveness · Cost–benefit analysis · Economic evaluation · Economic growth · Economics · Environmental health · Health care · Physical therapy · Political science · Population · Acute Ischemic Stroke Management · Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life · Medicine · Stroke Rehabilitation and Recovery · Gerontology · Rehabilitation

  • Decision Modelling For Health Economic Evaluation

    Anthony Briggs, Andrew Briggs et al.•Decision Modelling for Health…•2006

  • The economic cost of brain disorders in Europe

    Open Access•Jes Olesen, Anders Gustavsson et al.•European Journal of Neurology•2012

  • Data Resource Profile

    Axel Börsch‐supan, Axel Börsch-Supan et al.•International Journal of…•2013

  • Economic evidence on integrated care for stroke patients; a systematic review

    Open Access•Johanneke F M M Tummers, Augustinus J P Schrijvers et al.•International Journal of…•2012

  • Modeling Valuations for EuroQol Health States

    Paul Dolan•Medical Care•1997

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae