Benefits and challenges of pasture cropping
Perceptions of grazing producers in the United States
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21474928 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Tong Wang (0000-0002-9483-0050, South Dakota State University, corresponding author), Akinsola Oyebanji (South Dakota State University), Tim Steffens (0000-0002-3263-0723, West Texas A&M University), Srinivasulu Ale (0000-0001-7563-2836), Bhupinder Singh (0000-0002-9443-9975, University of Arizona), Miranda Stotz, Miranda K Stotz (West Texas A&M University), Hardev Singh (0000-0002-5977-8437) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 2 |
| Pages | 49-55 |
| Publication date | 2026-04-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Rangelands (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0190-0528 • E-ISSN: 1551-501X |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.rala.2025.11.005 |
| OpenAlex | W7116837209 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 7 |
Pasture cropping has gained traction in Australia, but it remains a relatively novel idea in the United States. • Farmers who rely on grassland as their primary source of income are more likely to try pasture-cropping practices. • Pasture cropping could provide several key benefits, including improved forage quality, reduced input costs, improved animal health, and enhanced soil health and biodiversity. • The success of pasture cropping is influenced by several factors, including insufficient precipitation, which could pose a substantial challenge for producers in certain regions. • Farmers who received >170 mm of precipitation during the grass dormant season had the highest average success rate of 82% when pasture cropping
Cropping · Forage · Grassland · Grazing · Livestock · Pasture · Rangeland · Pasture and Agricultural Systems · Rangeland and Wildlife Management · Ruminant Nutrition and Digestive Physiology
| Highly cited | No |
|---|