Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why aren't more landowners enrolling in land-based carbon credit exchanges

Bibliographic Data

ID21474944
AuthorsLandon R Schofield, Micayla E Pearson (0009-0009-5663-3062, Pearson (United States)), Samuel Newell, Nathan Clackum, Benjamin L Turner (0000-0002-6585-0722, Texas A&M University – Kingsville, corresponding author)
Year2024
Volume46
Issue4
Pages117-131
Publication date2024-08-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueRangelands (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0190-0528 • E-ISSN: 1551-501X
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.rala.2024.05.004
OpenAlexW4401197624
LanguageEN
References cited30

Increasing concern from both private citizens and intergovernmental organizations about the effects of climate change has led to regulatory and voluntary mechanisms aimed at reducing greenhouse gas emissions, including an emerging carbon credit market. Despite the opportunities for landowners to diversify revenue streams within current operations, there are risks (i.e., production and financial, market, legal-transactional, and social) that could reduce landowner enrollment rates. We used a systems thinking approach to map the feedback relationships among landowner decision-making considerations, soil system processes, and carbon credit market incentives. Our findings illustrate the complex set of constraints of participation in carbon credit programs and how they interact by revealing a limits to growth archetype. Landowners and crop and livestock producers are uniquely positioned to shape and develop the carbon credit market by filling the gap between equitable transaction participation for both carbon credit buyers and sellers looking to capture value from mitigating greenhouse gas emissions

Agriculture · Business · Carbon credit · Carbon offset · Database transaction · Economics · Greenhouse gas · Incentive · Land tenure · Microeconomics · Natural resource economics · Revenue · Transaction cost · Transactional leadership · Community Development and Social Impact · Forest Management and Policy · Sustainability and Climate Change Governance · Finance

  • Natural climate solutions

    Open Access•Bronson W Griscom, Justin Adams et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2017

  • Global demographic trends and future carbon emissions

    Open Access•Brian C O''Neill, Michael Dalton et al.•Proceedings of the National…•2010

  • Negative emissions—Part 2

    Open Access•Sabine Fuss, William F Lamb et al.•Environmental Research Letters•2018

  • Climate change mitigation options in the rural land use sector

    Open Access•Diana Feliciano, Colin Hunter et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2014

  • Motivations and barriers for Western Australian broad-acre farmers to adopt carbon farming

    Open Access•Marit E Kragt, Nikki P Dumbrell et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2017

  • An assessment of forest landowner interest in selling forest carbon credits in the Lake States, USA

    Open Access•Kristell A Miller, Stephanie A Snyder et al.•Forest Policy and Economics•2012

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae