Politics and Planning
How Do China and the United States Differ in Their Strategic Planning Approaches for Government Performance Management
Dados Bibliográficos
| ID | 21475447 |
|---|---|
| Autores | Jie Gao (0000-0002-9523-4541, National University of Singapore, autor correspondente) |
| Ano | 2024 |
| Volume | 47 |
| Fascículo | 13 |
| Páginas | 909-920 |
| Data de publicação | 2024-10-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Sim |
| Open Access | Não |
| Tipo | ARTICLE |
| Periódico | International Journal of Public Administration (JOURNAL) |
| Identificadores do periódico | ISSN: 0190-0692 • E-ISSN: 1532-4265 |
| Editora | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01900692.2024.2311373 |
| OpenAlex | W4391541128 |
| Idioma | EN |
| Referências citadas | 36 |
Strategic planning is integral to government performance management reforms in both China and the United States. How do the two countries differ in their planning approaches? This study examines this issue by using Charles Lindblom’s theory of synoptic and strategic planning. It shows that China relies on centralized, elite-led synoptic planning, rooted in its Communist legacy, while the United States, with its focus on social interaction in policymaking, places value on preference-guided and consultation-based strategic planning. This study highlights the pivotal role of strategic planning in serving political objectives, shaping its strengths and weaknesses as a management tool
Business · China · Economics · Elite · Political science · Politics · Preference · Public relations · Strategic financial management · Strategic human resource planning · Strategic planning · Strategic thinking · Strengths and weaknesses · China's Socioeconomic Reforms and Governance · International Development and Aid · Local Government Finance and Decentralization · Public Administration · Marketing
“Fragmented Authoritarianism 2.0”
Watering Down Environmental Regulation in China
Pernicious Manipulation of Performance Measures in China's Cadre Evaluation System
The principles of scientific management
Are We There Yet? The Evolution of the US Federal Performance Management Framework
Lindblom’s lament
A Behavioral Model of “Muddling Through” in the Chinese Bureaucracy
Levels of Value Integration in Federal Agencies' Mission and Value Statements
Target‐setting, political incentives, and the tricky trade‐off between economic development and environmental protection
"The Science of "Muddling Through
Target Interactions and Target Aspiration Level Adaptation
Retrofitting the Administrative State to the Constitution
Does Involvement in Performance Management Routines Encourage Performance Information Use? Evaluating GPRA and Part
The Future of Strategic Planning in the Public Sector
Does Strategic Planning Improve Organizational Performance? A Meta‐Analysis
Performance Management Routines That Work? An Early Assessment of the GPRA Modernization Act
The Government Performance and Results Act and the Tradition of Federal Management Reform
Strategic Planning Environment, Process, and Performance in Public Agencies
Studying the Chinese Policy Process in the Era of ‘Top-Level Design
The Reinvention of Development Planning in China, 1993–2012
The Distinctive Transition of China’s Five-Year Plans
A Strategy of Decision
Politics, Economics, and Welfare
Is China Socialist
| Velocidade de citação | historical |
|---|---|
| Altamente citado | Não |