Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Using Natural Language Processing to Read Plans

A Study of 78 Resilience Plans From the 100 Resilient Cities Network

Bibliographic Data

ID21476473
AuthorsXinyu Fu (0000-0002-3591-4158, Twitter (United States)), Chaosu Li (0000-0002-1146-2361, Twitter (United States)), Wei Zhai (0000-0003-4064-0427, Twitter (United States))
Year2023
Volume89
Issue1
Pages107-119
Publication date2023-01-02
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of the American Planning Association (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0194-4363 • E-ISSN: 1939-0130
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/01944363.2022.2038659
OpenAlexW4283168202
LanguageEN
Citations received25
References cited39

Problem, research strategy, and findings Planners need to read plans to learn and adapt current practice. Planners may struggle to find time to read and study lengthy planning documents, especially in emerging areas such as climate change and urban resilience. Recently, natural language processing (NLP) has shown promise in processing big textual data. We asked whether planners could use NLP techniques to more efficiently extract useful and reliable information from planning documents. By analyzing 78 resilience plans from the 100 Resilient Cities Network, we found that results generated from topic modeling, which is an NLP technique, coincided to a large extent (80%) with those from the conventional content analysis approach. Topic modeling was generally effective and efficient in extracting the main information of plans, whereas the content analysis approach could find more in-depth details but at the expense of considerable time and effort. We further propose a transferrable model for cutting-edge planners to more efficiently read and study a large collection of plans using machine learning. Our methodology has limitations: Both topic modeling and content analysis can be subject to human bias and generate unreliable results; NLP text processing techniques may create inaccurate results due to their specific method limitations; and the transferable approach can be only applied to big textual data where there are enough sufficiently long documents.Takeaway for practice NLP represents a valuable addition to the planner’s toolbox. Topic modeling coupled with other NLP techniques can help planners to effectively discover key topics in plans, identify planning priorities and plans of specific emphasis, and find relevant policies

Data science · Machine learning · Natural language processing · Planner · Toolbox · Topic model · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Artificial Intelligence

  • Bridging planning gaps

    Open Access•Xiliu He, Siyuan Hao et al.•Cities•2026

  • Toward a Human–AI Collaborative Workflow in Urban Design

    Open Access•Meichen Ding, Pengyue Hu et al.•Journal of Urban Technology•2026

  • Better policy to support climate change action in the built environment

    Open Access•Geoffrey R Browne, Anna Hurlimann et al.•Land Use Policy•2024

  • The next generation of machine learning for tracking adaptation texts

    Open Access•Anne J Sietsma, James D Ford et al.•Nature Climate Change•2024

  • A hybrid deep learning method for identifying topics in large-scale urban text data

    Open Access•Madison Lore, Julia Gabriele Harten et al.•Computers Environment and Urban…•2024

  • Deciphering Public Voices in the Digital Era

    Open Access•Xinyu Fu, Thomas W Sanchez et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2024

  • Can ChatGPT Evaluate Plans

    Open Access•Xinyu Fu, Ruoniu Wang et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2024

  • Text mining public feedback on urban densification plan change in Hamilton, New Zealand

    Open Access•Xinyu Fu, Catherine Brinkley et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2024

  • Natural language processing for planning policy identification

    Open Access•Tianyuan Wang, Jerry Chen et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2026

  • Transforming urban planning through machine learning

    Open Access•Lin Yang, Yang Lin et al.•Environment and Planning B Urban…•2026

  • The Research Landscape of AI in Urban Planning

    Open Access•Thomas W Sanchez, Xinyu Fu et al.•Urban Science•2024

  • The Pathway of Urban Planning AI

    Open Access•Zhong‐ren Peng, Kai-Fa Lu et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2023

  • PaRIT

    Open Access•Cyrus Chimento, Nicholas Finio et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2023

  • Evaluating Citizen Participation in Local Public Meetings

    Open Access•Xuanyi Nie, Haijing Liu et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2025

  • Automating Plan Evaluation Using Agentic Large Language Models

    Open Access•Xinyu Fu, Chaosu Li•Journal of Planning Education and…•2025

  • Assessing equity in infrastructure investment distribution among U.S. cities

    Open Access•Zhenhua Chen, Donghwan Ki et al.•Cities•2025

  • Using natural language processing to evaluate local conservation text

    Open Access•Yang Chen, Luchen Zhang et al.•Journal of Cultural Heritage•2024

  • How has urban metabolism research contributed to urban resilience? A conceptual review of practices

    Open Access•Hsi‐chuan Wang, Vincent Nathan Lim•Journal of Industrial Ecology•2025

  • Analyzing planning meetings using large language models

    Dan Milz, Jennifer A Kagan et al.•Planning Practice and Research•2026

  • What and How Should Urban Planners Learn in the AI Era? Exploring Urban AI Pedagogy from a Pilot Course in Urban Planning Education

    Open Access•Xiaofan Liang•Journal of Planning Education and…•2026

  • Advancing AI-Assisted Policy-Text Analysis

    Open Access•Ning Wu, Binwei Yang et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2026

  • Decoding mixed-use development in urban planning regulatory frameworks

    Open Access•Haithem Drici, José Carpio-Pinedo et al.•Cities•2026

  • Using Large Language Models to Assess Equity in U.S. Local Government American Rescue Plans

    Mildred E Warner, Zijing Zhao et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2026

  • Machine learning applications for urban geospatial analysis

    Open Access•Abdulrazzaq Shaamala, Tan Yigitcanlar et al.•Cities•2025

  • A large language model-based approach to building the knowledge graph for master plan

    Open Access•W S Zhang, Wusiqin Zhang et al.•Land Use Policy•2025

  • Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning

    Open Access•Emily Talen•Journal of Planning Literature•1996

  • Resilience as a policy narrative

    Christophe Béné, Lyla Mehta et al.•Climate and Development•2018

  • Evaluating Plan Implementation

    Lucie Laurian, Maxine Day et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2004

  • Are We Planning for Sustainable Development?

    Philip R Berke, Philip Berke et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2000

  • General Plan Evaluation Criteria

    William C Baer•Journal of the American Planning…•1997

  • Searching for the Good Plan

    Open Access•Philip Berke, David R Godschalk et al.•Journal of Planning Literature•2009

  • Examine the effects of neighborhood equity on disaster situational awareness

    Open Access•Wei Zhai, Zhong-Ren Peng et al.•International Journal of Disaster…•2020

  • Tracking Our Footsteps

    Li Fang, Reid Ewing•Journal of the American Planning…•2020

  • Plans Versus Political Priorities

    Albert T Han, Lucie Laurian et al.•Journal of the American Planning…•2021

  • Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century

    Open Access•Thomas Elmqvist, Erik Andersson et al.•Nature Sustainability•2019

  • Evaluating Plans Pragmatically

    Open Access•Charles Hoch, Charles J Hoch•Planning Theory•2002

  • Low-Regrets Incrementalism

    Open Access•W H Butler, Robert E Deyle et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2016

  • Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research

    Open Access•Mark R Stevens, Ward Lyles et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2014

  • Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012

    Open Access•Ward Lyles, Mark R Stevens•Journal of Planning Education and…•2014

  • Prototypical Resilience Projects for Postdisaster Recovery Planning

    Open Access•Wei Zhai, Zhong‐ren Peng et al.•Journal of Planning Education and…•2021

  • Tackling Uncertainty in US Local Climate Adaptation Planning

    Open Access•Missy Stults, Larissa Larsen•Journal of Planning Education and…•2018

  • Do We Learn from Planning Practice

    Open Access•Watson•Journal of Planning Education and…•2002

  • What Is in a Plan? Using Natural Language Processing to Read 461 California City General Plans

    Open Access•Catherine Brinkley, Carl Stahmer•Journal of Planning Education and…•2021

  • Globalizing urban resilience

    Helga Leitner, Elaine Sheppard et al.•Urban Geography•2018

  • Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology

    Open Access•Jyoti Belur, Lisa Tompson et al.•Sociological Methods & Research•2018

  • Urban resilience

    Open Access•Sierra Woodruff, Ann O’m Bowman et al.•Cities•2021

  • Building up resilience in cities worldwide – Rotterdam as participant in the 100 Resilient Cities Programme

    Open Access•Marjolein Spaans, BAS WATERHOUT•Cities•2017

  • How Do Local Policy Makers Learn about Climate Change Adaptation Policies? Examining Study Visits as an Instrument of Policy Learning in the European Union

    Open Access•Wolfgang Haupt•Urban Affairs Review•2020

  • Reading Through a Plan

    Brent D Ryan•Journal of the American Planning…•2011

Unique citing works25
Citations per year8,33
Citation span2023 - 2026 (4)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 22

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae