Using Natural Language Processing to Read Plans
A Study of 78 Resilience Plans From the 100 Resilient Cities Network
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21476473 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Xinyu Fu (0000-0002-3591-4158, Twitter (United States)), Chaosu Li (0000-0002-1146-2361, Twitter (United States)), Wei Zhai (0000-0003-4064-0427, Twitter (United States)) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 107-119 |
| Publication date | 2023-01-02 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Planning Association (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0194-4363 • E-ISSN: 1939-0130 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01944363.2022.2038659 |
| OpenAlex | W4283168202 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 25 |
| References cited | 39 |
Problem, research strategy, and findings Planners need to read plans to learn and adapt current practice. Planners may struggle to find time to read and study lengthy planning documents, especially in emerging areas such as climate change and urban resilience. Recently, natural language processing (NLP) has shown promise in processing big textual data. We asked whether planners could use NLP techniques to more efficiently extract useful and reliable information from planning documents. By analyzing 78 resilience plans from the 100 Resilient Cities Network, we found that results generated from topic modeling, which is an NLP technique, coincided to a large extent (80%) with those from the conventional content analysis approach. Topic modeling was generally effective and efficient in extracting the main information of plans, whereas the content analysis approach could find more in-depth details but at the expense of considerable time and effort. We further propose a transferrable model for cutting-edge planners to more efficiently read and study a large collection of plans using machine learning. Our methodology has limitations: Both topic modeling and content analysis can be subject to human bias and generate unreliable results; NLP text processing techniques may create inaccurate results due to their specific method limitations; and the transferable approach can be only applied to big textual data where there are enough sufficiently long documents.Takeaway for practice NLP represents a valuable addition to the planner’s toolbox. Topic modeling coupled with other NLP techniques can help planners to effectively discover key topics in plans, identify planning priorities and plans of specific emphasis, and find relevant policies
Data science · Machine learning · Natural language processing · Planner · Toolbox · Topic model · Computer Science · Disaster Management and Resilience · Environmental and Social Impact Assessments · Geographic Information Systems Studies · Artificial Intelligence
Bridging planning gaps
Toward a Human–AI Collaborative Workflow in Urban Design
Better policy to support climate change action in the built environment
The next generation of machine learning for tracking adaptation texts
A hybrid deep learning method for identifying topics in large-scale urban text data
Deciphering Public Voices in the Digital Era
Can ChatGPT Evaluate Plans
Text mining public feedback on urban densification plan change in Hamilton, New Zealand
Natural language processing for planning policy identification
Transforming urban planning through machine learning
The Research Landscape of AI in Urban Planning
The Pathway of Urban Planning AI
PaRIT
Evaluating Citizen Participation in Local Public Meetings
Automating Plan Evaluation Using Agentic Large Language Models
Assessing equity in infrastructure investment distribution among U.S. cities
Using natural language processing to evaluate local conservation text
How has urban metabolism research contributed to urban resilience? A conceptual review of practices
Analyzing planning meetings using large language models
What and How Should Urban Planners Learn in the AI Era? Exploring Urban AI Pedagogy from a Pilot Course in Urban Planning Education
Advancing AI-Assisted Policy-Text Analysis
Decoding mixed-use development in urban planning regulatory frameworks
Using Large Language Models to Assess Equity in U.S. Local Government American Rescue Plans
Machine learning applications for urban geospatial analysis
A large language model-based approach to building the knowledge graph for master plan
Do Plans Get Implemented? A Review of Evaluation in Planning
Resilience as a policy narrative
Evaluating Plan Implementation
Are We Planning for Sustainable Development?
General Plan Evaluation Criteria
Searching for the Good Plan
Examine the effects of neighborhood equity on disaster situational awareness
Tracking Our Footsteps
Plans Versus Political Priorities
Sustainability and resilience for transformation in the urban century
Evaluating Plans Pragmatically
Low-Regrets Incrementalism
Measuring and Reporting Intercoder Reliability in Plan Quality Evaluation Research
Plan Quality Evaluation 1994–2012
Prototypical Resilience Projects for Postdisaster Recovery Planning
Tackling Uncertainty in US Local Climate Adaptation Planning
Do We Learn from Planning Practice
What Is in a Plan? Using Natural Language Processing to Read 461 California City General Plans
Globalizing urban resilience
Interrater Reliability in Systematic Review Methodology
Urban resilience
Building up resilience in cities worldwide – Rotterdam as participant in the 100 Resilient Cities Programme
How Do Local Policy Makers Learn about Climate Change Adaptation Policies? Examining Study Visits as an Instrument of Policy Learning in the European Union
Reading Through a Plan
| Unique citing works | 25 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 8,33 |
| Citation span | 2023 - 2026 (4) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 22 |