Toward Evidence-Based Urban Planning
Integrating Quality Assessments in Literature Reviews
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21476858 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Léa Ravensbergen (0000-0003-3259-6673, Twitter (United States)), Ahmed El-Geneidy (0000-0002-0942-4016, Twitter (United States)) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 89 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 389-398 |
| Publication date | 2023-07-03 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of the American Planning Association (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0194-4363 • E-ISSN: 1939-0130 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01944363.2022.2074872 |
| OpenAlex | W4285024347 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 5 |
| References cited | 27 |
Literature reviews can play a pivotal role in designing urban policies. Here we introduce two tools used by public health specialists to assess the quality of studies and quantify the evidence derived from them: the Risk of Bias Assessment (RoB) and Evaluation of Certainty of Evidence (ECE). The RoB scores articles on several domains (e.g., selection bias, study design, etc.) to provide an appraisal of how rigorous the study is, whereas the ECE tool provides a framework to clearly state how much certainty there is in the outcomes under study. Both tools can be used to enhance literature review articles in urban planning to better inform practitioners on how to best develop policies using a rigorous approach
Alternative medicine · Business · Certainty · Critical appraisal · Management science · Process management · Urban planning · Computer Science · Engineering · Health disparities and outcomes · Health Policy Implementation Science · Mathematics · Medicine · Psychology · Urban Transport and Accessibility · Artificial Intelligence
GRADE guidelines
Does Compact Development Make People Drive Less?
Examining the Impacts of Residential Self‐Selection on Travel Behaviour
How to Write a Literature Review Paper?
Contextualizing Walkability
Amstar 2
Evidence-Based Public Health
GRADE guidelines
Methodological quality (risk of bias) assessment tools for primary and secondary medical studies
A typology of reviews
Tracing and building up environmental justice considerations in the urban ecosystem service literature
Use and value of systematic reviews in English local authority public health
Urban sprawl, food security and agricultural systems in developing countries
Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature Review
Critical moments in the production of `rigorous' and `relevant' cultural economic geographies
Health and the Built Environment
How many cases do I need
| Unique citing works | 5 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 2.5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 5 |