A product-level framework for prioritizing circular and sustainable construction in building design
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21477136 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Roger Vergés (0009-0001-5887-4785, Median SCP (Spain)), Kàtia Gaspar (0000-0003-3842-1401, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya, corresponding author), Núria Forcada (0000-0003-2109-4205, Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 121 |
| Pages | 108561 |
| Publication date | 2026-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Environmental Impact Assessment Review (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0195-9255 • E-ISSN: 1873-6432 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.eiar.2026.108561 |
| OpenAlex | W7164900936 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 62 |
The construction sector is a major contributor to climate change, driven largely by its design and construction processes. Early-stage decisions are critical for achieving sustainability, yet these considerations are often introduced too late in projects. While existing tools such as multi-criteria decision-making methods and LCA-BIM integration support material selection, they typically operate at building scale or require complete datasets, limiting their applicability when product-specific information is incomplete and decisions have the greatest impact on circularity outcomes. This paper addresses this gap by developing a decision-support framework for evaluation of sustainable construction products during early design phases. The framework enables contextual comparisons across key indicators of circularity, environmental performance, material integrity, biodiversity, economic value, and social impact through standardized performance evaluation. It integrates data from Environmental Product Declarations, Declarations of Performance, manufacturers' technical sheets, Bills of Quantities, and Building Information Modelling outputs. Calculation methods are formulated for each indicator based on available information, promoting transparency and comparability. This differentiates the framework from black-box optimization tools, allowing stakeholders to understand and verify how products are evaluated. The framework aligns with current regulations and emerging research while adapting to both data availability and stakeholder priorities. Without such a tool, the lack of a comprehensive approach risks misinterpretations of sustainability, potentially overlooking healthier alternatives. The framework empowers stakeholders to make informed choices from the outset, fostering more circular, sustainable buildings with enhanced traceability
Building construction · Building Design · Construction industry · Sustainability · Sustainable Design · Sustainable development · Sustainable Building Design and Assessment · Sustainable Design and Development · Sustainable Supply Chain Management
ReCiPe2016
Impact 2002
A Doughnut for the Anthropocene
Modeling the determinants of large-scale building water use
A conceptual framework for understanding the contribution of building materials in the achievement of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
A meta-analysis of country-level studies on environmental change and migration
The Environmental Impacts of Reuse
Analysis of building environment assessment frameworks and their implications for sustainability indicators
Large-scale analysis of environmental and circularity metrics in construction products through automated data extraction using large language models
Including biodiversity in life cycle assessment – State of the art, gaps and research needs
Future temperature-related excess mortality under climate change and population aging scenarios in Canada
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |