Beyond the presumption of monogamy
The role of religiosity, political conservatism and mononormativity in motivating opposition towards poly families / Más allá de la presunción de monogamia: el rol de la religiosidad, el conservadurismo político y la mononormatividad como motivadores de la oposición hacia las polifamilias
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21481639 |
|---|---|
| Authors | I Grigoropoulos (0000-0001-5987-5483, Panteion University, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2024 |
| Volume | 39 |
| Issue | 1 |
| Pages | 85-116 |
| Publication date | 2024-01-01 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | International Journal of Social Psychology Revista de Psicología Social (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0213-4748 • E-ISSN: 1579-3680 |
| Publisher | SAGE Publications (PUBLISHER • US) |
| DOI | 10.1177/02134748231218170 |
| OpenAlex | W4392607129 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 3 |
| References cited | 72 |
In light of the current discussion concerning poly families’ rights, this study examined the motivational underpinnings of opposition to poly families. Grounded on the theoretical line that institutional and ideological systems can legitimize the ostracism of stigmatized groups, the current exploratory research project examined the relationship between religiosity and opposition to poly families and whether this relationship is mediated by political positioning and mononormativity in a serial fashion. Specifically, Study 1 ( N = 277) examined the effect of religiosity on opposition towards polyamorous parents and whether the endorsement of conservative ideology and mononormativity would mediate this relationship. Study 2 ( N = 193) replicated the first study’s findings using a behavioural expression of negative stigma towards poly families’ rights. Study 1 showed that opposition towards poly families might be affected by religiosity and that the impact of religiosity is mediated by conservative ideology and mononormativity. Study 2 showed that religiosity could affect opposition to poly families’ rights through conservative ideology and mononormativity. This study provides evidence that the more religious participants are likely to express attitudinal and behavioural opposition towards poly families and that the more religious participants endorsed ideas based on conservative and mononormativity principles, the more they opposed poly families. The current exploratory study shows the relation between system-justifying ideological manifestations in prejudice towards poly families
Conservatism · Political science · Politics · Presumption · Religiosity · Law · Marriage and Sexual Relationships · Psychology · Social Psychology
In Defense of Tradition
On the Interpretation and Use of Mediation
Belief in a just God (and a just society)
Swinging
The puzzle of monogamous marriage
Investigation of Consensually Nonmonogamous Relationships
A Critical Examination of Popular Assumptions About the Benefits and Outcomes of Monogamous Relationships
This Is My Partner, and This Is My … Partner's Partner
Lesbian motherhood desires and challenges due to minority stress
Defining Polyamory
Determining Power and Sample Size for Simple and Complex Mediation Models
Progressive Polyamory
Polyamorous Parenting
Identifying Context-Related Socio-Cultural Predictors of Negative Attitudes Toward Polyamory
Polyamorous Families, Same-Sex Marriage, and the Slippery Slope
Polyamory Is Deviant – But Not for the Reasons You May Think
Need Fulfillment in Polyamorous Relationships
Gender, Feminist, and Intersectional Perspectives on Families
Development of a brief measure of attitudes towards polyamory
Agreements, rules and agentic fidelity in polyamorous relationships
The Monogamy GapMen, Love, and the Reality of Cheating
Essentialist Beliefs About Homosexuality
Antecedents and Consequences of System-Justifying Ideologies
The Fewer the Merrier
The good, the bad, and the ugly
Whatever happened to non-monogamies? Critical reflections on recent research and theory
Introduction
‘There Aren’t Words for What We Do or How We Feel So We Have To Make Them Up’
The Duke University Religion Index (Durel)
Sociocultural and individual manifestations of sexual stigma
Love and sex
The privilege of perversities
Wanting ‘the whole loaf’
The Roles of Politics, Feminism, and Religion in Attitudes Toward LGBT Individuals
A Nationwide Study of Norwegian Beliefs About Same-sex Marriage and Lesbian and Gay Parenthood
Which Partners Are More Human? Monogamy Matters More than Sexual Orientation for Dehumanization in Three European Countries
U.S. Family Law Along the Slippery Slope
Greek High School Teachers' Homonegative Attitudes Towards Same-Sex Parent Families
Attitudes Toward Same-Sex Marriage in a Greek Sample
Adoption social workers’ perspectives on same-sex couples’ right to adopt in Greece
Lesbian mothers' perceptions and experiences of their school involvement
The Intersection of Gender, Sexuality, and Religion in Mormon Mixed-Sexuality Marriages
System Justification, Right-Wing Conservatism, and Internalized Homophobia
Confronting Sexual Stigma and Prejudice
Has the American Public’s Interest in Information Related to Relationships Beyond “The Couple” Increased Over Time
Around Consensual Nonmonogamies
A Social Movement Society
My country, right or wrong
From Fantasy to Reality
Monogamy versus Consensual Non-Monogamy
Mapping Changes in Attitudes towards Gays and Lesbians in Europe
Reconstruing Intolerance
Political conservatism as motivated social cognition
Amar Amores
Religion, Religiosity, and the Attitudes Toward Homosexuality-A Multilevel Analysis of 79 Countries
Gay Fatherhood Experiences and Challenges Through the Lens of Minority Stress Theory
Increased Support for Same-sex Marriage in the US
Sexual need fulfillment and satisfaction in consensually nonmonogamous relationships
Thinking Relationship Anarchy from a Queer Feminist Approach
Religion and Support for Adoption by Same-Sex Couples
| Unique citing works | 3 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3 |
| Citation span | 2025 - 2025 (1) |
| Citation velocity | recent |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 3 |