Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Fiber burden and asbestos-related diseases

An umbrella review

Bibliographic Data

ID21481852
AuthorsJ M Ramada (0000-0002-3854-1596, Parc de Salut, corresponding author), José María Ramada Rodilla, Beatriz Calvo Cerrada, Beatriz Calvo-Cerrada (0000-0001-8052-3319, Parc de Salut), Consol Serra Pujadas (Parc de Salut), George L Delclos (0000-0003-0201-8135, Southwest Center for Educational Excellence), Fernando G Benavides (0000-0003-0747-2660, Centro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Epidemiología y Salud Pública)
Year2022
Volume36
Issue2
Pages173-183
Publication date2022-03-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueGaceta Sanitaria (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0213-9111 • E-ISSN: 1578-1283
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.gaceta.2021.04.001
PMID34120777
OpenAlexW3169983245
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited22

OBJECTIVE: What are the levels of asbestos exposure that cause each type of health effect? The objective of this study was to review the available scientific evidence on exposure levels for asbestos and their relationship to health effects. METHOD: An umbrella review of English-language reviews and meta-analyses, from 1980 to March 2021 was conducted. We included reviews involving quantified asbestos exposures and health outcomes. The review has been adapted to the indications of the PRISMA declaration. Methodological quality of the selected studies was assessed using the AMSTAR instrument. RESULTS: We retrieved 196 references. After applying the search strategy and quality analysis, 10 reviews were selected for in-depth analysis. For lung cancer, the highest risk was observed with exposure to amphiboles. Longer, thinner fibers had the greatest capacity to cause lung cancer, especially those > 10 μm in length. For mesothelioma, longer and thinner fibers were also more pathogenic; amphiboles ≥ 5 μm are especially associated with increased mesothelioma risk. No studies observed an increased risk for lung cancer or mesothelioma at asbestos exposure levels <0.1 f/ml. No reviews provided information on exposure concentrations for pulmonary fibrosis. Currently, there is limited evidence in humans to establish the causal relationship between gastrointestinal cancer and asbestos exposure. CONCLUSIONS: Banning all asbestos exposure remains the best measure to preventing its negative health effects. The highest quality reviews and meta-analyses support that there is little risk of lung cancer or mesothelioma at daily exposure levels below 0.1 f/ml

Asbestos · Asbestos fibers · Composite material · Environmental health · Fiber · MEDLINE · Air Quality and Health Impacts · Chemistry · Materials Science · Medicine · Multiple and Secondary Primary Cancers · Occupational and environmental lung diseases

  • Experimental study of the long-term impact of asbestos prohibition mandate in tunnels, subway, and urban environments in Tehran

    Open Access•Sam Dehhaghi, Hossein Hasankhnani•Environment Development and…•2024

  • Development of AMSTAR

    Open Access•Beverley J Shea, Jeremy M Grimshaw et al.•BMC Medical Research Methodology•2007

  • Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses

    Open Access•David Moher, Alessandro Liberati et al.•PLoS Medicine•2009

Unique citing works1
Citations per year0,5
Citation span2024 - 2024 (1)
Citation velocityrecent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 1

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae