Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Is Khelobedu a language or a dialect

Bibliographic Data

ID21490879
AuthorsTebogo Jacob Rakgogo (0000-0002-8693-2559, Tshwane University of Technology, corresponding author), Itani Peter Mandende (0000-0002-2656-0482, Tshwane University of Technology)
Year2022
Volume42
Issue2
Pages179-189
Publication date2022-05-04
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueSouth African Journal of African Languages (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0257-2117 • E-ISSN: 2305-1159
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02572117.2022.2094049
OpenAlexW4285609389
LanguageEN
Citations received3
References cited9

The primary aim of this article is to investigate whether Khelobedu should be considered a language in its own right or whether it has correctly been classified as one of the dialects of Sepedi, referred to in Section 6(1) of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, as Sepedi, one of the 11 official languages of South Africa. The article was initiated by a dialectal controversy surrounding the politics of dialects and languages in South Africa. Dialectology as a conceptual framework was considered as the body of theory that guides this article and buttresses the authors’ point of view. The article is purely qualitative in nature and employed content analysis supplemented by focus group interviews with members of the Modjadji Traditional Council and face-to-face interviews with 20 university students who ethnically identified themselves as Balobedu. Participants for the article were purposively selected based on their proficiency and knowledge about the researched phenomenon as articulated by Creswell and Creswell. Based on lexical dissimilarities realised between Khelobedu and Sepedi, the article concludes that Khelobedu is not a dialect, but a language on its own. The findings reveal that the decision to classify Khelobedu as a dialect of Sepedi was meant to accommodate the administrative system of the apartheid regime, being a purely political exercise which lacked transparency, consultation and a linguistic justification. It is further found that decisions about whether speech forms constitute an independent language or a dialect are based on language ideology and not on linguistic criteria

Constitution · Dialectology · Ideology · Language ideology · Linguistics · Political science · Politics · Social science · Sociology · Law · Linguistic research and analysis · Linguistic Variation and Morphology · Multilingual Education and Policy

  • Onomastic Controversy on Sepedi and Northern Sotho/Sesotho sa Leboa Language Names

    Open Access•Tebogo Jacob Rakgogo•E-Journal of Humanities Arts and…•2024

  • The voice of a people

    Open Access•Yanga L P Majola, Yanga LP Majola et al.•South African Journal of African…•2026

  • Development of Indigenous Language Orthographies

    Open Access•Juniel Shoko Matavire•International Journal of Critical…•2024

  • The elevation of Sepedi from a dialect to an official standard language

    Open Access•Tebogo Jacob Rakgogo, Evangeline Bonisiwe Zungu•Literator•2022

  • New History of South Africa

    Open Access•Cornelius Thomas•New Contree•2008

  • A diachronic approach to the explanation of problematic/unusual past tense forms in Lobedu and Northern Sotho

    Albert E Kotzé•South African Journal of African…•2004

  • The Southern Bantu Languages

    Malcolm Guthrie•African Affairs•1955

  • Language ideologies and the consequences of standardization

    Open Access•James Milroy•Journal of Sociolinguistics•2001

Unique citing works3
Citations per year1,5
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Citation velocitycurrent
Highly citedNo
Citation typesNeutral: 3

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae