Challenging ungrievability for people missing at sea. Search infrastructures, spaces of public mourning, and claims for justice
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 2149394 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Chiara Denaro (0000-0001-5463-2722, University of Bologna, corresponding author), P Boccagni (0000-0001-8379-8561, University of Trento) |
| Year | 2025 |
| Volume | 48 |
| Issue | 8 |
| Pages | 1453-1478 |
| Publication date | 2025-06-11 |
| Peer Reviewed | Yes |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Ethnic and Racial Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0141-9870 • E-ISSN: 1466-4356 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/01419870.2023.2268172 |
| OpenAlex | W4387958005 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 7 |
| References cited | 37 |
Since the so-called refugee crisis, the central Mediterranean Sea has been identified as the deadliest border in the world. As the critical border studies debate has shown, these deaths reflect the structural violence of border regimes and demand due forms of political accountability and responsibility. At the same time, dominant power structures differentially shape the visibility and grievability of those who are missing and dead at the border, as well as the public narratives on life and death in migration. Keeping this complexity as a background, and drawing on examples from Lampedusa and Tunisia, we investigate the politics of challenging Butler's 'ungrievability' - the lack of access to preconditions, spaces, and times of private and public mourning and commemoration. We critically discuss the interplay between three components of this political arena: the search infrastructures of the missing and dead at sea, made of several institutional, non-governmental and civil society actors; the creation of "spaces of commemoration" through place-making (e.g. in cemeteries, squares, online platforms), time-marking (i.e. recurrent events) and collective actions (e.g. civic committees); the claims for justice and political accountability for those deaths, including through formal legal channels (i.e. trials and criminal reports). Overall, we illustrate how deaths at sea are unequally perceived, addressed and commemorated, in terms of claims for identification, accountability and justice, among different and often conflicting stakeholders - civil society actors, family members and public authorities
Accountability · Criminology · Economic Justice · Geography · Law and economics · Political economy · Political science · Politics · Power (physics · Refugee · Sociology · Visibility · Law · Migration and Exile Studies · Migration, Health and Trauma · Migration, Refugees, and Integration
Handbook on international migration
The Geography of Border Militarization
Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture
Borderlands/La Frontera
The legal field as battleground for social struggle
The Death of Asylum
The Human Condition
Homo Sacer
Discursive Approaches to Ambiguous Loss
Ambiguous Loss and Complicated Grief
Retelling racialized violence, remaking white innocence
UN Sustainable Development Goals and the “Refugee Gap”
International Refugee Law and Refugee Policy
Migration, Borders and “De-bordering” in Pandemic Times
Racialized Borders
Death at the Border
The Trauma and Complicated Grief of Ambiguous Loss
Between Enforcement and Precarity
Death at the Border
Europe's Shame
Death as the border
Contestations in death - the role of grief in migration struggles
Introduction
Death at the Border
Remote control of migration
Violence, Mourning, Politics
Necropolitics
Overcoming Ungrievability
Why Border Enforcement Backfired
| Unique citing works | 7 |
|---|---|
| Citations per year | 3,5 |
| Citation span | 2024 - 2026 (3) |
| Citation velocity | current |
| Highly cited | No |
| Citation types | Neutral: 6 |