Saltar al contenido principal

ETHNOS_APP

Inicio • Búsqueda • Revistas • Lista 0

‘Not fully coordinated’

The loosely coupled paradigm as a framework for understanding relationships of educators in teacher education programmes

Datos Bibliográficos

ID21494463
AutoresYael Grinshtain (0000-0003-1205-0083, Education, Tel-Hai College Faculty Social Sciences and Humanities, Kiryat Shemona, Israel, autor de correspondencia), Orit Avidov‐Ungar (0000-0002-0928-9280, Education, Achva Academic College, Shikmim, Israel), Haim Shaked (0000-0002-3998-7696, Education, Hemdat Hadarom College of Education, Netivot, Israel), Idit Livneh (Education, The Academic College Levinsky-Wingate, Netanya, Israel), Daniel Nikritin (Education, Hemdat Hadarom Academic College of Education, Netivot, Israel)
Año2024
Volumen50
Número4
Páginas707-724
Fecha de publicación2024-08-07
Peer ReviewedSí
Open AccessNo
TipoARTICLE
RevistaJournal of Education for Teaching International Research and Pedagogy (JOURNAL)
Identificadores de la revistaISSN: 0260-7476 • E-ISSN: 1360-0540
EditorialInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02607476.2023.2299440
OpenAlexW4390338909
IdiomaEN
Referencias citadas38

Teacher education programmes have undergone a shift over the past decade, from traditional programmes that focused on the academic arena (university or college) towards more placement-based ones located in the field (school). Based on the loosely coupled paradigm, the present study examined the characteristics of the various relationships built between educators in the two arenas and how these relationships shape teacher education programmes in Israel, focusing on the preparation period of pre-service teachers. Forty-five educators (teacher educators; mentor teachers; programme heads) were interviewed. Using thematic analysis, two themes regarding relationships were found: who forms the relationship and what its purpose is; and the nature of the relationship. Two additional themes emerged regarding the relationship which shaped the teacher education programme: a highly bureaucratic profile; and procedures dependent on personal relationships. The study shed light on the implementation of a school-based experience (practicum) for pre-service teachers that is based on academia-field partnership. Using loosely coupled paradigms in accordance with the findings, it seems that bureaucratic procedures tend to increase at the expense of pedagogical aspects, as demonstrated by the educators involved in the teacher education programmes

Bureaucracy · General partnership · Mathematics education · Pedagogy · Political science · Politics · Practicum · Pre-service teacher education · Qualitative research · Social science · Sociology · Teacher education · Thematic analysis · Collaborative Teaching and Inclusion · Educational Assessment and Improvement · Psychology · Teacher Education and Leadership Studies

  • Doing Triangulation and Mixed Methods

    Uwe Flick•Doing Triangulation and Mixed…•2018

  • The Impact of Induction and Mentoring Programs for Beginning Teachers

    Open Access•Richard M Ingersoll, Michael Strong•Review of Educational Research•2011

  • Loosely Coupled Systems

    James Douglas Orton, Karl E Weick•Academy of Management Review•1990

  • Exploring beginning teachers’ attrition in the Netherlands

    Open Access•Perry Den Brok, Theo Wubbels et al.•Teachers and Teaching•2017

  • Learning from professional challenges identified by school and institute-based teacher educators within the context of school–university partnership

    Elizabeth White, Miranda Timmermans et al.•European Journal of Teacher…•2022

  • Humans in Hierarchies

    Open Access•Renée Rinehart Kathawalla, Jal Mehta•Educational Administration…•2022

  • From Policies to Principals

    Maria Paino•Social Forces•2017

  • Educating Teacher Educators

    Marilyn Cochran‐smith, Marilyn Cochran-Smith et al.•The New Educator•2019

  • School administrators and university practicum supervisors as boundary brokers for initial teacher education in Chile

    Open Access•Carmen Montecinos Sanhueza, Carmen Montecinos et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2015

  • Teachers’ agentic actions in tight and loosely coupled effective secondary schools in Chile

    Open Access•Carmen Montecinos Sanhueza, Mónica Cortéz et al.•Teaching and Teacher Education•2022

  • Mediation in mentoring

    Open Access•Lily Orland-Barak, Lily Orland‐barak•Teaching and Teacher Education•2014

  • Advancing Critical and Culturally Relevant Experiential Learning

    Open Access•Brittany N Anderson, Chonika Coleman-King et al.•The Urban Review•2022

  • Response to How Teacher Education Matters

    Open Access•Linda Darling-Hammond•Journal of Teacher Education•2023

  • Teaching as a Clinical Profession

    Open Access•Ayelet Becher, Adam Lefstein•Journal of Teacher Education•2021

  • Teacher Mentoring in Service of Preservice Teachers' Learning to Teach

    Open Access•Lily Orland-Barak, Lily Orland‐barak et al.•Journal of Teacher Education•2021

  • Lost in Translation in the Study of Mentoring 17 Years Later

    Open Access•Lily Orland-Barak, Lily Orland‐barak•Journal of Teacher Education•2023

  • Teaching Practicum During Covid-19

    Open Access•Lee Jin Choi, Mi Yung Park•SAGE Open•2022

  • Learning from Error in Violence Prevention

    Open Access•Sarah Goodrum, Jessie Slepicka et al.•Sociology of Education•2022

Velocidad de citaciónhistorical
Altamente citadoNo
Ethnos_APP • Proyecto Open Source • Licencia MIT • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacidad y Cookies • Documentación de la API: api.ethnos.app/docs • Código de la API: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Código del Frontend: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae