Fixing the misalignment of the concession of corporate legal personality
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21495328 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Jonathan Hardman (0000-0002-1794-0424, University of Edinburgh, corresponding author) |
| Year | 2023 |
| Volume | 43 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 443-460 |
| Publication date | 2023-09-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Legal Studies (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0261-3875 • E-ISSN: 1748-121X |
| Publisher | Cambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1017/lst.2022.44 |
| OpenAlex | W4315486601 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 1 |
| References cited | 3 |
The nature of separate legal personality is a perennial debate in corporate law. This paper uses insights from a previous iteration of the debate to argue that separate legal personality is best seen as a two-step process: it is a concession from the state to something real. That real thing is the economic concept of the firm, which has been recently debated within institutional economics. Viewing separate legal personality as a two-step process lets us explore whether the concession of separate legal personality is operating as it should. Law imposes no prerequisite requirement that a firm exists before establishing a company, nor limits firms to only one company. Law thus facilitates misalignments between the firm and the company. Such misalignments will only occur if two constituencies within the company structure – the ultimate shareholders and directors – consider it in their interests to create such misalignment. As a result, these misalignments harm third parties by allowing risk to be exported to them through opportunistic misalignment. This paper then explores the methods of misalignment and reviews current legal tools which are available to be deployed to re-align the company to the firm, and argues that they should be deployed
Business · Corporate governance · Corporate law · Economics · Harm · Industrial organization · Law and economics · Legal process · Personality · Political science · Shareholder · Computer Science · Corporate Law and Human Rights · Law · Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems · Legal principles and applications · Psychology · Social Psychology · Finance
| Citations per year | 1 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2026 - 2026 (1) |
| Highly cited | No |