‘Climate Change isn't Optional’

Climate Change in the Core Law Curriculum

Bibliographic Data

ID21495529
AuthorsKim Bouwer (0000-0002-1981-8537, Durham University, corresponding author), Evan John (0000-0002-7530-9665, JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States)), Oliver Luke (JPMorgan Chase & Co (United States)), Amanda Rozhan (Government of the United Kingdom)
Year2023
Volume43
Issue2
Pages240-258
Publication date2023-06-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLegal Studies (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0261-3875 • E-ISSN: 1748-121X
PublisherCambridge University Press (CUP) (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1017/lst.2022.35
OpenAlexW4308486185
LanguageEN
Citations received1
References cited16

This paper makes a case for the integration of compulsory climate change topics across the core law curriculum. It argues that the most persuasive rationale for this is based in climate legal obligations and institutions, and a clear-eyed perception of climate risk, rather than the sustainability agenda. To this end, the paper outlines efforts taken to ‘mainstream’ climate change and environmental law education in a core course of the LLB degree – land law. An empirical study sought to evaluate the students’ engagement with these materials, and their broader views concerning climate change and their legal education. The paper critically evaluates the course and the results of the empirical study. It concludes that students want to be, and should be, taught climate law and the climate context of law as part of their prescribed learning throughout the core curriculum, rather than as optional or elective content

Climate change · Curriculum · Empirical research · Environmental law · Epistemology · Geography · Legal Education · Mainstream · Political science · Sociology · Sustainability · Sustainable development · Climate Change and Geoengineering · Engineering · Environmental law and policy · Law · Property Rights and Legal Doctrine

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access