Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Substantive Equality and Equal Citizenship 1

Bibliographic Data

ID21497301
AuthorsAmy R Baehr (0000-0002-6474-3685, Department of Philosophy Hofstra University Hempstead NY 11549 United States, corresponding author)
Year2020
Volume37
Issue5
Pages854-862
Publication date2020-11-01
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Applied Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0264-3758 • E-ISSN: 1468-5930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/japp.12463
OpenAlexW3087844243
LanguageEN

In Part 1, I argue that Watson and Hartley’s relational feminist political liberal approach – grounded in the idea of equal citizenship – produces a rather elusive liberal feminist agenda (because of its reliance on intuitions) and that it may lose track of the importance of goods whose value stems from the role they play in an individual woman’s or girl’s life rather than from the role they play in securing equal citizenship. I suggest that a distributive principle approach – like that of Susan Okin – might do better on both scores. In Part 2, I argue that Watson and Hartley may have overpromised what the state can and may do. Discussion includes focus on policy questions concerning, for example, prostitution and the gendered division of labor

Citizenship · Distributive property · Epistemology · Feminist philosophy · Political science · Politics · Sociology · Watson · Gender Studies · Law · Philosophy · Political Philosophy and Ethics

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae