Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Directed Panspermia, Wild Animal Suffering, and the Ethics of World‐Creation

Bibliographic Data

ID21497364
AuthorsGary David O’Brien (0000-0002-8528-5724, University of Oxford, corresponding author), Gary David O'Brien (University of Oxford Uehiro Centre for Practical Ethics Oxford UK)
Year2022
Volume39
Issue1
Pages87-102
Publication date2022-02-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Applied Philosophy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0264-3758 • E-ISSN: 1468-5930
PublisherWiley (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1111/japp.12538
OpenAlexW3175434706
LanguageEN
Citations received6

Directed panspermia is the deliberate seeding of lifeless planets with microbes, in the hopes that, over evolutionary timescales, they will give rise to a complex self‐sustaining biosphere on the target planet. Due to the immense distances and timescales involved, human beings are unlikely ever to see the fruits of their labours. Such missions must therefore be justified by appeal to values independent of human wellbeing. In this article, I investigate the values that a directed panspermia mission might promote. Paying special attention to the outcome in which sentient animals evolve, I argue that we have strong reasons to believe the value of a mission would be negative. Research on wild animal suffering has shown that there is a huge amount of suffering among wild animals on Earth. I argue that there are structural features of evolution by natural selection which explain the prevalence of suffering on Earth and make it predictable that suffering would prevail on the target planet too. Finally, using insights from procreative ethics I argue on non‐consequentialist grounds that creators have duties to their sentient creations which cannot be met in directed panspermia missions

Appeal · Archaeology · Astrobiology · Biology · Biosphere · Creatures · Environmental ethics · Epistemology · Planet · Political science · Sociology · Computer Science · Evolution and Science Education · Evolutionary Game Theory and Cooperation · History · Law · Philosophy · Religion, Ecology, and Ethics · Ecology

  • Why Health-Based Vegan Advocacy May Harm More Animals Than It Saves

    Open Access•Daniel Dorado•Food Ethics•2026

  • Animals and Longtermism

    Oscar Horta, Mat Rozas•World Futures•2025

  • Bully for You? Breed-Specific Legislation and Dangerous Dog Breeds

    Open Access•Gary David O’Brien•Journal of Agricultural and…•2025

  • Totalism, Animals, and the Repugnant Conclusion

    Open Access•Gary David O’Brien•Utilitas•2024

  • Wild Animal Suffering Is Not Intractable

    Open Access•Tristan David Katz•Journal of Applied Philosophy•2026

  • AI Alignment

    Open Access•Yip Fai Tse, Adrià Moret et al.•Philosophy & Technology•2025

Citations per year3
Citation span2024 - 2026 (3)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae