Deagrarianization and socioeconomic drivers of forest cover change in rural Poland
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21497901 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sławomir Sioma (Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development), Monika Stanny (0000-0003-4954-1679, Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development, corresponding author), Łukasz Komorowski (0000-0001-9287-719X, Institute of Rural and Agricultural Development), Jarosław Socha (0000-0002-9568-5764, University of Agriculture in Krakow) |
| Year | 2026 |
| Volume | 169 |
| Pages | 108111 |
| Publication date | 2026-10-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Land Use Policy (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754 |
| Publisher | Elsevier BV (PUBLISHER) |
| DOI | 10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108111 |
| OpenAlex | W7162774318 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 49 |
This study examines how changes in forest cover in rural Poland are related to socioeconomic development and the degree of deagrarianization of local economies. Understanding these relationships is essential for the design of effective land-use and afforestation policies in structurally diverse rural regions. The analysis was conducted at the level of local administrative units (LAU), covering all rural municipalities in Poland during 2004–2013, a period of intensive forest expansion supported by the Common Agricultural Policy (CAP). During the study period, Poland’s forest area increased from 28.7% to 29.3%. Private forests accounted for 80.5% of this increase, indicating that agricultural land-to-forest transitions were the dominant source of new forest area. Using generalized additive models, we identified distinct non-linear relationships between afforestation intensity and key socioeconomic indicators. Forest cover growth was strongest in municipalities with low levels of socioeconomic development and a dominant agricultural function. The effect of deagrarianization was threshold-based: afforestation intensity increased with the deagrarianization index up to approximately 0.3, beyond which no further increase was observed. Spatially, forest expansion was concentrated in peripheral municipalities, particularly those distant from regional centres and characterised by relative monofunctional, family-farming-based economies. The results demonstrate that recent afforestation patterns are weakly aligned with areas of highest ecological need, revealing shortcomings in the spatial targeting of CAP instruments. The findings provide policy-relevant evidence for the development of territorially differentiated afforestation strategies, improved alignment of financial incentives with local socioeconomic conditions, and more effective integration of afforestation into land-use planning and forest policy
Forest cover · Land cover · Rural area · Rural development · Socioeconomic status · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Plant Ecology and Soil Science · Rural development and sustainability
Twenty years of ecosystem services
Determinants of agricultural diversification
What is the future of abandoned agricultural lands? A systematic review of alternative trajectories in Europe
Biodiversity’s contributions to sustainable development
The potential of European abandoned agricultural lands to contribute to the Green Deal objectives
Governing Europe's forests for multiple ecosystem services
Acceptance of sticks, carrots and sermons as policy instruments for directing private forest management
What influences European private forest owners' affinity for subsidies
Forest ownership changes in Europe
The EU climate package “Fit for 55” - a double-edged sword for Europeans and their forests and timber industry
The art of the “green” deal
Perceptions of ownership among new forest owners – A qualitative study in European context
The economic values of global forest ecosystem services
Payments for ecosystem services
De-/re-agrarianisation
EU rural development policy in the new member states
Rural roads, agricultural extension, and productivity
Extension, advice and knowledge systems for private forestry
Policy instruments for environmental public goods
Resilience through policy integration in Europe? Domestic forest policy changes as response to absorb pressure to integrate biodiversity conservation, bioenergy use and climate protection in France, Germany, the Netherlands and Sweden
| Highly cited | No |
|---|