Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Granular and spatially differentiated density thresholds for No Net Land Take

A scenario-based cellular automata analysis in French territories

Bibliographic Data

ID21497919
AuthorsIgor Agbossou (Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, corresponding author), Tudal Sinsin, Jean-Philippe Antoni, Jean‐Philippe Antoni (0000-0003-2980-745X, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Gilles Vuidel (0000-0001-6330-6136, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique), Edouard Patault (0000-0001-7089-9881)
Year2026
Volume169
Pages108156
Publication date2026-10-01
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueLand Use Policy (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0264-8377 • E-ISSN: 1873-5754
PublisherElsevier BV (PUBLISHER)
DOI10.1016/j.landusepol.2026.108156
OpenAlexW7164562603
LanguageEN
References cited25

The "No Net Land Take" (NNLT) objective – halting land artificialization by 2050 – poses a fundamental planning challenge: how to accommodate housing demand without new land take. This paper addresses two issues. First: by demonstrating that achieving Net No Land Take (NNLT) requires moving beyond uniform average density targets toward spatially differentiated density thresholds adapted to local urban contexts. Second: by establishing that spatial computing methodologies, particularly high-resolution cellular automata modeling, provide an appropriate framework for defining and testing such granular density thresholds under NNLT constraints. To investigate these issues, we employ the LucSim high-resolution cellular automata model to simulate five density scenarios up to 2050 across two contrasting French territories: the demographically dynamic peri-metropolitan Grand Rovaltain (GR) and the ecologically sensitive, tourism-driven Aire Gapençaise (AG). Simulations are calibrated with official 2050 housing targets from their respective Territorial Coherence Schemes (SCoT) and translated into six settlement entity‐specific density thresholds to test whether granular spatialization matters. Methodologically, cellular automata prove appropriate for this task because they spatially allocate densification under policy constraints while preserving local morphological realism. Our results show that higher-density scenarios can substantially limit land artificialization and protect high-quality soils. However, the effectiveness of densification strategies strongly depends on regional socio-economic and biophysical contexts. This study provides a quantitative, scenario-based framework for policymakers, emphasizing that context-sensitive densification is essential for reconciling urban development with environmental sustainability

Cellular automaton · Land use · Spatialization · Housing Market and Economics · Land Use and Ecosystem Services · Urban Planning and Valuation

  • Shaping the Next One Hundred Years

    Robert J Lempert, Robert Lempert et al.•Shaping the next one hundred years•2003

  • Decision Making under Deep Uncertainty

    Open Access•Vincent A W J Marchau, Warren E Walker et al.•Decision Making under Deep…•2019

  • Cellular automata models for the simulation of real-world urban processes

    Open Access•Inés Santé, Andrés M García et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2010

  • A Self-Modifying Cellular Automaton Model of Historical Urbanization in the San Francisco Bay Area

    Open Access•Keith C Clarke, Stacy Hoppen et al.•Environment and Planning B…•1997

  • Are European cities becoming dispersed?

    Open Access•Marjo Kasanko, José I Barredo et al.•Landscape and Urban Planning•2006

  • Modeling urban land use change by the integration of cellular automaton and Markov model

    Open Access•Dongjie Guan, Haifeng Li et al.•Ecological Modelling•2011

  • The governance of smart mobility

    Open Access•Iain Docherty, George Marsden et al.•Transportation Research Part A…•2018

  • Adapt or Perish

    Open Access•Warren E Walker, Warren Walker et al.•Sustainability•2013

  • On the influence of density and morphology on the Urban Heat Island intensity

    Open Access•Yunfei Li, Sebastian Schubert et al.•Nature Communications•2020

  • Towards a credible, relevant and legitimate implementation framework for the EU no net land take objective

    Antoine Decoville, Valérie Feltgen•Journal of Environmental Planning…•2026

  • A framework for classifying and quantifying the natural capital and ecosystem services of soils

    Open Access•Estelle Dominati, Murray Patterson et al.•Ecological Economics•2010

  • What drives land take and urban land expansion? A systematic review

    Open Access•Alice Colsaet, Yann Laurans et al.•Land Use Policy•2018

  • Regulating urban densification

    Open Access•Jacques Teller•Buildings and Cities•2021

  • Towards sustainable landscapes

    Open Access•Inés Gutiérrez-Briceño, Marina García-Llorente et al.•Environmental Science & Policy•2024

  • Dynamic adaptive policy pathways

    Open Access•Marjolijn Haasnoot, J H Kwakkel et al.•Global Environmental Change•2013

  • Clarifying the EU objective of no net land take

    Open Access•Antoine Decoville, Valérie Feltgen•Land Use Policy•2023

  • The Urban Renewal Matrix

    Open Access•Harel Nachmany, Ravit Hananel•Land Use Policy•2023

  • The Compact City

    Open Access•Elizabeth Burton•Urban Studies•2000

Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae