Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Child welfare workers’ attitudes towards network and family kinship care in Norway

Bibliographic Data

ID21498518
AuthorsGéraldine Mabille (0000-0002-6210-5671, UiT The Arctic University of Norway, corresponding author), Jeanette Skoglund (0000-0002-7755-3223, UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Renee Thørnblad (0000-0003-2561-7018, UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Susan Kaiser (0000-0002-2081-7734, UiT The Arctic University of Norway), Sabine Kaiser (Centre for Arctic Gas Hydrate, Environment and Climate)
Year2026
Pages1-14
Publication date2026-06-25
Peer ReviewedYes
Open AccessYes
TypeARTICLE
VenueJournal of Social Work Practice (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0265-0533 • E-ISSN: 1465-3885
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02650533.2026.2689986
OpenAlexW7165851905
LanguageEN
References cited29

This study examines and compares Norwegian child welfare workers’ attitudes towards network and family kinship care, where children who are removed from their parents’ care are placed with someone in their social network or with relatives. Using data from a 2023 national survey, we assessed differences in attitudes and their implications for child welfare practices. While workers generally had positive attitudes towards both care types, they showed more favourable attitudes towards network care (Cohen’s ds from .17 to .90). The questions related to cooperation with foster parents and the follow-up of foster homes revealed the largest differences between family and network care. These findings emphasise the need to develop strategies addressing the unique challenges posed by each type of care. This approach would move away from treating kinship care as a homogeneous entity and instead recognise the specific needs of network care versus family kinship care

Foster care · Homogeneous · Kinship · Kinship care · Norwegian · Welfare · Child Abuse and Trauma · Child Welfare and Adoption · Children's Rights and Participation · Social Work

  • Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science

    Open Access•Daniël Lakens•Frontiers in Psychology•2013

  • Mental health and quality of life among Norwegian child welfare service workers

    Open Access•Amy Østertun Geirdal, Per Nerdrum et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2024

  • Advantages and disadvantages of kinship foster care – Perspectives from child welfare workers in Norway

    Open Access•Kristina Jæger Meyer, Jeanette Skoglund et al.•European Journal of Social Work•2026

  • Breakdown of teenage placements in Swedish foster and residential care

    Open Access•Marie Sallnäs, Bo Vinnerljung et al.•Child & Family Social Work•2004

  • Nonfamilial kinship carers—Who are they and what support do they need to nurture children

    Open Access•Meredith Kiraly•Child & Family Social Work•2018

  • When Children Cannot Remain Home

    Jill D Berrick•The Future of Children•1998

  • Systematic Review of Kinship Care Effects on Safety, Permanency, and Well-Being Outcomes

    Open Access•Marc Winokur, Marc A Winokur et al.•Research on Social Work Practice•2015

  • Children in kinship care

    Open Access•Howard Dubowitz, Susan Feigelman et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•1994

  • Kinship family foster care

    Open Access•Gary S Cuddeback•Children and Youth Services Review•2004

  • Family ties

    Open Access•A C Ferraro, E J Maher et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2022

  • Settling into a new home as a teenager

    Open Access•Lena Hedin, Ingrid Höjer et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2011

  • Associations between family resilience and health outcomes among kinship caregivers and their children

    Open Access•Anthony Gómez•Children and Youth Services Review•2021

  • True ambivalence

    Open Access•Jay Peters•Children and Youth Services Review•2005

  • Are children safer with kin? A comparison of maltreatment risk in out-of-home care

    Open Access•Sarah A Font•Children and Youth Services Review•2015

  • Placement stability in kinship and non-kin foster care

    Open Access•Gretchen Perry, M Daly et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2012

  • Factors influencing decision making about the placement of children in care

    Open Access•Jenna Meiksans, Marie Iannos et al.•Children and Youth Services Review•2015

  • Convenient Yet Neglected

    Open Access•Ines Zuchowski, Susan Gair et al.•The British Journal of Social Work•2019

  • Associations between child protective services workers’ attitudes toward kinship foster care placement, sociodemographic characteristics, and job characteristics

    Pamela Lilleston, Jessica Borden et al.•Journal of Public Child Welfare•2026

Citation velocityhistorical
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOIOpen Access
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae