Adaptive retrieval practice with multiple‐choice questions in the university classroom
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21499754 |
|---|---|
| Authors | Sven Greving (0000-0002-5072-6307, University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany, corresponding author), Wolfgang Lenhard (0000-0002-8184-6889, University of Würzburg Würzburg Germany), Tobias Richter (0000-0002-0467-9044, University of Würzburg) |
| Year | 2020 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 6 |
| Pages | 799-809 |
| Publication date | 2020-12-01 |
| Open Access | Yes |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Journal of Computer Assisted Learning (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0266-4909 • E-ISSN: 1365-2729 |
| Publisher | Wiley (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1111/jcal.12445 |
| OpenAlex | W3026355857 |
| Language | EN |
| References cited | 63 |
Retrieval practice promotes retention more than restudying (i.e., the testing effect ) and is applied to many educational settings. However, little research has investigated means to enhance this effect in educational settings. Theoretical accounts assume retrieval practice to be the most effective whenever retrieval is difficult but successful. Therefore, we developed a novel retrieval practice procedure, which adapts to learners' abilities and can be applied irrespective of learning content. This adaptive procedure aims to make retrieval gradually easier whenever students provide an incorrect answer. In a field experiment, students read book chapters as part of a weekly university course. In three consecutive weeks, they then practiced reading assignments by (a) adaptive testing, (b) non‐adaptive testing and (c) restudy. In Week 4, a surprise criterial test took place. Restudy outperformed both testing conditions, whereas adaptive testing performed equally well as non‐adaptive testing. However, exploratory analyses revealed that with increasing retention intervals, the superiority of restudy disappeared. Furthermore, whenever participants fully read the assignments and retention intervals increased, adaptive testing outperformed non‐adaptive testing. In sum, adaptive retrieval practice did not prove to be generally superior, but retention interval and students' preparation for class might be conditions rendering adaptive retrieval useful in educational settings
Adaptive Learning · Adaptive strategies · Computerized adaptive testing · Information retrieval · Mathematics education · Multimedia · Psychometrics · Surprise · Computer Science · Educational Strategies and Epistemologies · Intelligent Tutoring Systems and Adaptive Learning · Memory Processes and Influences · Psychology · Social Psychology · Artificial Intelligence
Experiments with More Than One Random Factor
Emmeans
Test-Enhanced Learning
Improving Students’ Learning With Effective Learning Techniques
Testing the retrieval effort hypothesis
Memory and Metamemory Considerations in the Training of Human Beings
The Power of Testing Memory
Rethinking the Use of Tests
Least-Squares Means
Levels of processing
Fitting Linear Mixed-Effects Models Using lme4
Categorical data analysis
Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items
The effect of testing versus restudy on retention
What Is Wrong With Anova and Multiple Regression? Analyzing Sentence Reading Times With Hierarchical Linear Models
| Highly cited | No |
|---|