Skip to main content

ETHNOS_APP

Home • Search • Journals • List 0

Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts

Bibliographic Data

ID21503555
AuthorsT Y Branch (0000-0001-7824-1830, Institut Jean Nicod (IJN), Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS) - Université Paris Sciences Et Lettres (PSL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), corresponding author), Giancarlo Origgi (0000-0002-6162-8999, Institut Jean Nicod (IJN), Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS) - Université Paris Sciences Et Lettres (PSL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)), Tiffany Morisseau (0000-0002-2523-7755, Université de Paris and Université Gustave Eiffel, LaPEA, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France)
Year2022
Volume36
Issue3
Pages299-316
Publication date2022-05-04
Open AccessNo
TypeARTICLE
VenueSocial Epistemology (JOURNAL)
Journal identifiersISSN: 0269-1728 • E-ISSN: 1464-5297
PublisherInforma UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB)
DOI10.1080/02691728.2022.2042421
OpenAlexW4225120315
LanguageEN
Citations received9
References cited49

The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the considerable challenge of sourcing expertise and determining which experts to trust. Dissonant information fostered controversy in public discourse and encouraged an appeal to a wide range of social indicators of trustworthiness in order to decide whom to trust. We analyze public discourse on expertise by examining how social indicators inform the reputation of Dr. Didier Raoult, the French microbiologist who rose to international prominence as an early advocate for using hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19. To comprehend how these indicators came to inform his reputation, we outline Dr. Raoult’s rise to fame based on discourse about hydroxychloroquine. We then discuss why we trust in experts like scientist-practitioners. This is followed by an examination of how social indicators of trust like status, epistemic authority, influence and values have informed Dr. Raoult’s reputation. We conclude with recommendations for how to improve the selection and evaluation of social indicators of trust and reputations. Our aim here, instead of making a claim about the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine or Dr. Raoult’s reputation per se, is to outline through this case study how social indicators of trust inform reputation and the challenge they present to evaluating expertise

Appeal · Political science · Public relations · Public trust · Reputation · Social science · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology

  • Populism and medical advocacy

    Open Access•Gabriel Salgado Ribeiro De Sá•Social Science & Medicine•2025

  • How do online users respond to crowdsourced fact-checking

    Open Access•Folco Panizza, Piero Ronzani et al.•Humanities and Social Sciences…•2023

  • An overview on trust and trustworthiness

    Elisabetta Lalumera•Philosophical Psychology•2024

  • A holistic marine biosecurity risk framework that is inclusive of social, cultural, economic and ecological values

    Open Access•Marnie L Campbell, Chad L Hewitt•Marine Policy•2025

  • Enhanced Epistemic Trust and the Value-Free Ideal as a Social Indicator of Trust

    Open Access•T Y Branch•Social Epistemology•2022

  • Particularism Reaffirmed

    Kåre Hagen, M R X Dentith et al.•Social Epistemology•2025

  • Vaccine Hesitancy and the Concept of Trust

    Open Access•Ori Freiman•Minerva•2023

  • A cognitive resource-rational account of epistemic injustice

    Open Access•Cheyenne Dosso, Tiffany Morisseau et al.•The Philosophical Quarterly•2025

  • Performative credibility

    Open Access•Xinyan Wu•Social Science & Medicine•2024

  • The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation

    Francesca Giardini, Rafael Wittek•Oxford Handbook of Gossip and…•2019

  • A Tapestry of Values

    Kevin C Elliott•Tapestry of Values•2017

  • Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal

    Heather E Douglas, Heather Douglas•Science, Policy, and the…•2009

  • A Theory of Collective Reputations (with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Firm Quality)

    Jean Tirole•The Review of Economic Studies•1996

  • Measuring user influence on Twitter

    Open Access•Fernando Riquelme, Pablo González-Cantergiani•Information Processing & Management•2016

  • Retracted

    Open Access•Philippe Gautret, Jean-Christophe Lagier et al.•International Journal of…•2020

  • Deciding to trust, coming to believe

    Richard Holton•Australasian Journal of Philosophy•1994

  • Trust and Antitrust

    Annette C Baier, Annette Baier•Ethics•1986

  • Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with Covid-19 in Wuhan, China

    Open Access•Fei Zhou, Ting Yu et al.•The Lancet•2020

  • The science question in feminism

    Sandra G Harding•The science question in feminism•1986

  • Can Novices Trust Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism

    Johnny Brennan•Social Epistemology•2020

  • The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks

    Open Access•Dan M Kahan, Ellen Peters et al.•Nature Climate Change•2012

  • Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony

    Open Access•Elizabeth Anderson•EPISTÉMÈ•2011

  • Epistemic Vigilance

    Open Access•Dan Sperber, Fabrice Clément et al.•Mind & Language•2010

  • The local clinical scientist

    George Stricker, Steven J Trierweiler•American Psychologist•1995

  • How the Coronavirus Lockdown Impacts the Impoverished in India

    Open Access•G Agoramoorthy, Minna J Hsu•Journal of Racial and Ethnic…•2021

  • What Does it Mean that PRIMES is in P

    Open Access•Boaz Miller•Social Studies of Science•2009

  • When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement

    Open Access•Boaz Miller•Synthese•2013

  • Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues

    Open Access•Helen E Longino•Synthese•1995

  • Catching the Wave

    Open Access•Boaz Miller•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2014

  • Moral trust & scientific collaboration

    Karen Frost-Arnold•Studies in History and Philosophy…•2013

  • Experts

    Open Access•Alvin I Goldman•Philosophy and Phenomenological…•2001

  • Metacognition and cognitive monitoring

    John H Flavell•American Psychologist•1979

  • Epistemic Trust in Science

    Torsten Wilholt•The British Journal for the…•2013

  • The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy

    Judith Simon•Routledge Handbook of Trust and…•2020

  • The Construction of Lay Expertise

    Open Access•Steven Epstein•Science Technology & Human Values•1995

  • Myths of Gender

    Open Access•Saul Slapikoff•The Radical Teacher•2019

  • Hydroxychloroquine Controversies

    Open Access•Luc Berlivet, Ilana Löwy•Medical Anthropology Quarterly•2020

Citations per year2.25
Citation span2022 - 2025 (4)
Highly citedNo

Tools

Open DOI
Ethnos_APP • Open Source Project • MIT License • Frontend v2.0.0 • Privacy and Cookies • API Documentation: api.ethnos.app/docs • API Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17049435 • Frontend Source Code: GitHub • DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17050053 • cruz.rio.br • Expectantes Misericordiae