Why Trust Raoult? How Social Indicators Inform the Reputations of Experts
Bibliographic Data
| ID | 21503555 |
|---|---|
| Authors | T Y Branch (0000-0001-7824-1830, Institut Jean Nicod (IJN), Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS) - Université Paris Sciences Et Lettres (PSL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS), corresponding author), Giancarlo Origgi (0000-0002-6162-8999, Institut Jean Nicod (IJN), Ecole Normale Supérieure (ENS) - Université Paris Sciences Et Lettres (PSL), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)), Tiffany Morisseau (0000-0002-2523-7755, Université de Paris and Université Gustave Eiffel, LaPEA, F-92100 Boulogne-Billancourt, France) |
| Year | 2022 |
| Volume | 36 |
| Issue | 3 |
| Pages | 299-316 |
| Publication date | 2022-05-04 |
| Open Access | No |
| Type | ARTICLE |
| Venue | Social Epistemology (JOURNAL) |
| Journal identifiers | ISSN: 0269-1728 • E-ISSN: 1464-5297 |
| Publisher | Informa UK Limited (PUBLISHER • GB) |
| DOI | 10.1080/02691728.2022.2042421 |
| OpenAlex | W4225120315 |
| Language | EN |
| Citations received | 9 |
| References cited | 49 |
The COVID-19 crisis has highlighted the considerable challenge of sourcing expertise and determining which experts to trust. Dissonant information fostered controversy in public discourse and encouraged an appeal to a wide range of social indicators of trustworthiness in order to decide whom to trust. We analyze public discourse on expertise by examining how social indicators inform the reputation of Dr. Didier Raoult, the French microbiologist who rose to international prominence as an early advocate for using hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID-19. To comprehend how these indicators came to inform his reputation, we outline Dr. Raoult’s rise to fame based on discourse about hydroxychloroquine. We then discuss why we trust in experts like scientist-practitioners. This is followed by an examination of how social indicators of trust like status, epistemic authority, influence and values have informed Dr. Raoult’s reputation. We conclude with recommendations for how to improve the selection and evaluation of social indicators of trust and reputations. Our aim here, instead of making a claim about the efficacy of hydroxychloroquine or Dr. Raoult’s reputation per se, is to outline through this case study how social indicators of trust inform reputation and the challenge they present to evaluating expertise
Appeal · Political science · Public relations · Public trust · Reputation · Social science · Sociology · Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics · Law · Misinformation and Its Impacts · Psychology · Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment · Social Psychology
Populism and medical advocacy
How do online users respond to crowdsourced fact-checking
An overview on trust and trustworthiness
A holistic marine biosecurity risk framework that is inclusive of social, cultural, economic and ecological values
Enhanced Epistemic Trust and the Value-Free Ideal as a Social Indicator of Trust
Particularism Reaffirmed
Vaccine Hesitancy and the Concept of Trust
A cognitive resource-rational account of epistemic injustice
Performative credibility
The Oxford Handbook of Gossip and Reputation
A Tapestry of Values
Science, Policy, and the Value-Free Ideal
A Theory of Collective Reputations (with Applications to the Persistence of Corruption and to Firm Quality)
Measuring user influence on Twitter
Retracted
Deciding to trust, coming to believe
Trust and Antitrust
Clinical course and risk factors for mortality of adult inpatients with Covid-19 in Wuhan, China
The science question in feminism
Can Novices Trust Themselves to Choose Trustworthy Experts? Reasons for (Reserved) Optimism
The polarizing impact of science literacy and numeracy on perceived climate change risks
Democracy, Public Policy, and Lay Assessments of Scientific Testimony
Epistemic Vigilance
The local clinical scientist
How the Coronavirus Lockdown Impacts the Impoverished in India
What Does it Mean that PRIMES is in P
When is consensus knowledge based? Distinguishing shared knowledge from mere agreement
Gender, politics, and the theoretical virtues
Catching the Wave
Moral trust & scientific collaboration
Experts
Metacognition and cognitive monitoring
Epistemic Trust in Science
The Routledge Handbook of Trust and Philosophy
The Construction of Lay Expertise
Myths of Gender
Hydroxychloroquine Controversies
| Citations per year | 2.25 |
|---|---|
| Citation span | 2022 - 2025 (4) |
| Highly cited | No |